Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Sunanda W/O Mrutunjaya ... vs Smt. Neelawwa W/O Mellayya ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 12424 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12424 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Smt. Sunanda W/O Mrutunjaya ... vs Smt. Neelawwa W/O Mellayya ... on 13 October, 2022
Bench: Jyoti Mulimanipresided Byjmj
                              1




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
        DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
                           BEFORE
         THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100449 OF 2021 (PAR/POS)


BETWEEN:

SHRI. MRUTUNJAYA
S/O. SHIVABASAYYA HIREMATH
DEAD BY HIS LRS

1.      SMT. SUNANDA
        W/O MRUTUNJAYA HIREMATH
        AGE 52 YEARS,
        OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK
        R/O. BEVINKOPPA, TALUKA BAILHONGAL,
        DISTRICT BELAGAVI - 591 102.

2.      SHRI. SIDDAYYA
        S/O MRUTYUNAJAYA HIREMATH
        AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
        AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
        R/O. BEVINKOPPA TALUKA
        BAILHONGAL, DISTRICT BELAGAVI - 591102

3.      SMT. SAVITA
        W/O. ANIL HIREMATH,
        AGE: 33 YEARS,
        OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK
        R/O. BEVINKOPPA TALUKA,
        BAILHONGAL,
        DISTRICT BELAGAVI - 591 102.

4.      SMT. SUNITA
        W/O. SHIVAKUMAR GUDDAMATH
        AGE 31 YEARS,
        OCC AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
        R/O. BEVINKOPPA TALUKA
        BAILHONGAL, DISTRICT BELAGAVI - 591 102.
                              2




5.     SMT. MAHESHWARI
       W/O. VINAYAK GANACHARI
       AGE 29 YEARS,
       OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O. BEVINKOPPA TALUKA
       BAILHONGAL,
       DISTRICT BELAGAVI - 591 102.      ...APPELLANTS

[BY SRI MAHANTESH S.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]

AND:

1.     SMT. NEELAWWA
       W/O MELLAYYA MELLAYYANAVAR,
       AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O HULACHAWL/BAIRNCHAL,
       TALUKA BAILHONGAL, DISTRICT BELAGAVI - 591 102.

2.     SMT. SIDDALINGAWWA
       S/O. SHIVALINGAYYA TOGALADMATH
       AGE: 82 YEARS,
       OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O. MALLAPPA NAGAR BEHIND APMC MUDHOL,
       TALUKA MUDHOL, DISTRICT BAGALKOT - 587 313.

3.     SMT. SATAWWA
       W/O MAHARUDRAYYA HIREMATH,
       AGE: 78 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       C/O. SHRI. SHANKARAYYA HIREMATH,
       GOVT. RATION SHOP,
       R/O. HANGARKI, TALUKA AND DISTRICT,
       DHARWAD - 580 105.

4.     SMT. ANUSUYA
       W/O. CHANNABASAYYA PATIL,
       AGE: 75 YEARS,
       OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
       R/O: HOMANAHALLI,
       P/O: MADANHALLI
       TALUKA HALIYAL,
       DITRICT UTTARA KANNADA -581329.
                            3




5.   SMT. IRRAWWA
     W/O SHANTAYYA KALAMATH
     AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
     R/O KOTUR, TALUKA AND DISTRICT
     DHARWAD - 580 011.

6.   SHRI. SANGAYYA
     S/O SHIVABASAYYA HIREMATH,
     AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
     R/O. BEVINKOPPA, TALUKA BAILHONGAL
     DISTRIT BELAGAVI - 591 102.

7.   SMT. PARWATEWWA
     W/O SHEKHAYYA HIREMATH,
     AGE: 84 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
     R/O. HUNASHIKATTI , TALUKA: BAILHONGAL,
     DIST BELAGAVI - 591 153.

8.   SMT. DUNDAWWA
     W/O DEVANDRAYYA HIREMATH,
     AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
     R/O. HOGARTI, TALUKA: BAILHONGAL,
     DIST: BELAGAVI - 591 147.

9.   SHRI.TEERTHAYYA
     S/O SHIVABSAYYA HIREMATH,
     AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED TEACHER,
     R/O. 4TH CROSS, SADHANAKERI,
     DHARWAD TALUKA AND
     DISTRICT DHARWAD - 580 007.      ... RESPONDENTS


      THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
100 OF CPC, CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
06.06.2019 PASSED BY THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
BAILHONGAL IN R.A.NO.37/2019, CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 10.03.2017 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, BAILHONGAL, IN O.S.NO.297/2015.


      THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL POSTED FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                               4




                           ORDER

Though matter called twice, there is no representation

on behalf of appellants.

The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non-

compliance of office objections.

As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal

is filed on 16.08.2021. Now we are in the month of October

2022. It's been a year since the date of filing of the appeal,

so far office objections are not complied with.

It appears that the appellants have not instructed the

counsel on record to comply office objections and as already

noted above, though matter called twice, there is no

representation on behalf of appellants. Hence, the Regular

Second Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office

objection and also for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE TKN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter