Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12270 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MFA No. 649 OF 2020(MV)
BETWEEN
SRI RAJASHEKHAR B V
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
S/O VEERACHAR B S
R/AT HOUSE NO.920/67
GEETHASHRI NILAYA
4TH CROSS, NITTUVALLI ROAD
LABOUR COLONY
DAVANAGERE-577002.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.NARASIMHA PRASAD S D., ADV.)
AND
1. SRI A CHANDRASHEKHAR
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O M BASAPPA
R/AT DOOR NO.990/8
BEHIND KSRTC BUS STAND
BHAGATH SINGH NAGAR
DAVANAGERE-577004.
2. SRI A RAKSHITH M ACHAR
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
S/O MANJUNATHACHAR V
2
R/AT 4TH CROSS
NITTUVALLI ROAD
LABOUR COLONY
DAVANAGERE-577002
ALSO R/AT
HOUSE NO.105, 4TH CROSS
MALLAPPA LAYOUT
BABUSA PALYA
BENGALURU NORTH
BENGALURU-560043.
3. IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
BRANCH MANAGER
AT 3RD MAIN ROAD
P J EXTENSION
DAVANAGERE-577002.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.K.MANJUNATH, ADV. FOR R1:
SRI. D.VIJAYAKUMAR, ADV. FOR R3:
NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV
ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
15.07.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO. 972/2018 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT-IV,
DAVANGERE, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS. 66,743/-
WITH INTEREST AT 8 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF
PETITION TILL ITS REALIZATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
This appeal under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles
Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been
filed by the owner of the offending vehicle being
aggrieved by the judgment dated 15.7.2019 passed by
Principal Senior Civil Judge and MACT-IV, Davanagere in
MVC 972/2018.
2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal
briefly stated are that on 13.7.2018 when the claimant
after completing his work and moving towards Bapuji
Hospital near Dental Science College as pedestrian, at
that time, motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-17-EC-
3199 being ridden by its rider at a high speed and in a
rash and negligent manner, dashed to the claimant. As
a result of the aforesaid accident, the claimant sustained
grievous injuries and was hospitalized.
3. The claimant filed a petition under Section
166 of the Act seeking compensation. It was pleaded
that he spent huge amount towards medical expenses,
conveyance, etc. It was further pleaded that the
accident occurred purely on account of the rash and
negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver.
4. On service of notice, the respondents
appeared through counsel and filed written statements
in which the averments made in the petition were
denied.
5. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties,
the Claims Tribunal framed the issues and thereafter
recorded the evidence. The claimant himself was
examined as PW-1 and got exhibited documents namely
Ex.P1 to Ex.P13. On behalf of the respondents, one
witness was examined as RW-1 and got exhibited
documents namely Ex.R1 to Ex.R8. The Claims Tribunal,
by the impugned judgment, inter alia, held that the
accident took place on account of rash and negligent
driving of the offending vehicle by its driver, as a result
of which, the claimant sustained injuries. The Tribunal
further held that the claimant is entitled to a
compensation of Rs.66,743/- along with interest at the
rate of 8% p.a. and directed the respondent Nos.1 and
2, rider and owner of the offending vehicle to deposit
the compensation amount along with interest. Being
aggrieved, the present appeal has been filed.
6. The learned counsel for the owner of the
offending vehicle has contended that the rider of the
motorcycle was having valid learner's licence as on the
date of accident. In view of the judgment of this Court
passed in the case of the Divisional Manager, National
Insurance Co., Ltd. -v- Gangappa Mardeppa Kabbur and
others (MFA 22061/2012 c/w MFA CROB 100115/2014
(MV) disposed on 11.10.2018) and in the case of Senior
Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Belgaum -v- Jyotiba Appaji Shigate (Air Online 2019 Kar
1560), the Insurance Company is liable to pay
compensation to the claimant. The Tribunal has erred in
fastening the liability on the owner of the offending
vehicle.
Further, in view of the Division Bench decision of
this Court in the case of Ms.Joyeeta Bose and others
-v- Venkateshan.V and others (MFA 5896/2018
and connected matters disposed of on 24.8.2020),
the rate of interest granted by the Tribunal at 8% p.a.
on the compensation amount is on the higher side.
Hence, he sought for allowing the appeal.
7. On the other hand, the learned counsel for
the Insurance Company has contended that it is not in
dispute that as on the date of accident the rider of the
offending vehicle was having learner's licence and he
was not accompanied by a person having valid driving
licence. Since the insured has violated the policy
conditions, the Tribunal has rightly exonerated the
Insurance Company from liability. Hence, he sought for
dismissal of the appeal.
8. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and
perused the judgment and award of the Tribunal.
9. It is not in dispute that the claimant has
sustained injuries in the road traffic accident occurred
due to rash and negligent riding of the offending vehicle
by its rider. It is also not in dispute that the rider of the
offending vehicle was having learner's licence as on the
date of accident and he was riding the motorcycle
without being accompanied by a person having valid
driving licence. This Court in the case of the Divisional
Manager, National Insurance Co., Ltd. -v- Gangappa
Mardeppa Kabbur and others (MFA 22061/2012 c/w MFA
CROB 100115/2014 (MV) disposed on 11.10.2018) and
in the case of Senior Divisional Manager, National
Insurance Co. Ltd., Belgaum -v- Jyotiba Appaji Shigate
(Air Online 2019 Kar 1560) has held that the learner's
licence is also a valid licence and the rider or learner
need not accompany any instructor for motorcycle as
required in case of four wheeler motor vehicle, which
requires instructor and hence the Insurance Company is
liable to pay compensation to the claimant.
In view of the above decisions referred supra, the
owner of the offending vehicle is exonerated from
liability and the Insurance Company is directed to pay
compensation to the claimant.
However, in respect of awarding interest, in view
of the Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of
Ms.Joyeeta Bose and others -v- Venkateshan.V
and others (MFA 5896/2018 and connected
matters disposed of on 24.8.2020), the rate of
interest awarded by the Tribunal at 8% p.a. on the
compensation amount is on the higher side and the
same is reduced to 6%.
10. In the result, the appeal is allowed in part.
The judgment of the Claims Tribunal is modified.
The owner of the offending vehicle is exonerated
from liability.
The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the
compensation amount along with interest @ 6% p.a.
from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date
of realization, within a period of six weeks from the date
of receipt of copy of this judgment.
The amount in deposit is ordered to be refunded to
the appellant after due verification.
Sd/-
JUDGE DM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!