Karnataka High Court
B.M.Risaldar K.A.S. ... vs Liyakat S/O Ahmadkhan ... on 16 November, 2022
Bench: Jyoti Mulimani
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.100022 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
B.M. RISALDAR
K.A.S. ADMINISTRATOR
SHERKHAN JUMMA MASJID,
DARBAR GALLI, BELAGAVI.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI AHAMED ALI REHMAN SHAH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )
AND:
1. LIYAKAT
S/O AHMADKHAN SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE:MAJOR, OCC:BUSINESS AND
P.A.HOLDER OF 7 TRUSTIES OF
SHERKHAN JUMMA MASJID,
DARBAR GALLI, BELAGAVI,
R/O: DARBAR GALLI, BELAGAVI.
2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA BOARD OF WAKF,
DARUL WAKF,
NO.7, CUNNIGHAM ROAD,
BANGALURU-52.
3. THE CHIARMAN/SECRETARY
THE DISTRICT WAKF ADVISORY
COMMITTEE, HIGH STREET,
CAMP BELAGAVI.
4. NARAYAN PREMJI PATEL,
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
2
4(A) SMT. MANABAI W/O NARAYAN PATEL,
AGE:42 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O:269 NISHAM BUILDING,
SANT SENA ROAD,
SHASHTRI NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
4(B) VINOD S/O NARAYAN PATEL
AGE:56 YEALRS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O:269 NISHAM BUILDING,
SANT SENA ROAD,
R/O:269 NISHAM BUILDING,
SANT SENA ROAD,
SHASHTRI NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
4(C) PURSHOTTAM S/O NARAYAN PATEL
AGE:45 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O:269 NISHAM BUILDING,
SANT SENA ROAD,
SHASHTRI NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
4(D) JADHAVJI S/O NARAYAN PATEL
AGE:42 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O:269 NISHAM BUILDING,
SANT SENA ROAD,
SHASHTRI NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
4(E) SMT. DAMUANTI W/O GANGARAM PATEL
AGE:40 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O:269 NISHAM BUILDING,
SANT SENA ROAD,
SHASHTRI NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
5. LAXMAN S/O NAGAPPA MALAI
AGE:38 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O KANBARGI, TQ:BELAGAVI.
6. NARAYAN S/O NAGAPPA MALAI
AGE:32 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O KANBARGI, TQ:BELAGAVI.
7. ASIRKHAN
S/O ABDU RASHID SHETKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE:55 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O:CCB NO.110, BEHIND VISTAR FINPELS,
2ND INER, KAIMRAL, BELAGAVI.
3
8. SHEKRKHAN
S/O MOHAMMADKHAN SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE:55 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O:CCB NO.110, BEHIND VISTAR FINPELS,
2ND LINER, KAIMRAL, BELAGAVI.
9. KHADARKHAN TEHMAN SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE:60 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O:3668, KHANJAR GALLI, BELAGAVI.
10. MUNNEER AHEMDKHAN NOORAHMED
SHERKHANWALE @ INAMDAR,
AGE:54 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: KHANJAR GALLI, BELAGAVI.
11. SHIKANDARKHAN
S/O MOHAMMEDKHAN
SHERKHANWALE @ INAMDAR
AGE:70 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O H.NO.4803/1, 1ST CROSS,
SHIVAJI NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
12. ABDULMAJID ASADKHAN SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
12(A) FAYAZAHMED
S/O ABDULMAJID SHERKHANWALE @ INAMDAR
AGE:50 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O.H.NO.3672, KHANJAR GALLI, BELAGAVI.
12(B) JAFARAHMED
S/O ABDULMAJID SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE:48 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O H.NO.3672, KHANJAR GALLI,
BELAGAVI.
12(C) AMJADKHAN
S/O ABDULMAJID SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: H.NO.3672, KHANJAR GALLI,
BELAGAVI.
4
12(D) SAJIDAHMED
S/O ABDULMAJID SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE:44 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O H.NO.3672, KHANJAR GALLI,
BELAGAVI.
12(E) HARSHAD
S/O ABDULMAJID SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE:42 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O H.NO.3672, KHANJAR GALLI,
BELAGAVI.
12(F) JAHEER
S/O ABDULMAJID SHERKHANWALE
@ INAMDAR,
AGE:38 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O H.NO.3672, KHANJAR GALLI,
BELAGAVI.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B.MAHAMMED ALI, ADVOCATE, FOR R2.)
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING
TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED IN KWT/BGM/SR/O.S-2/2005
DATED 20.10.2015 BY THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, AND KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI, MARKED
AT ANNEXURE-A, ETC.,.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though the matter is called twice, there is no
representation on behalf of petitioner.
The captioned petition was listed on 19.11.2021. On
that day there was no representation on behalf of
petitioner.
Thereafter, the petition was listed on 14.01.2022
and finally two weeks time was granted to remove all
office objections and to furnish fresh process fee for
issuance of notice to un-served respondents.
The petition was once again listed on 08.11.2022.
On that day the counsel for petitioner appeared and
sought time. This Court granted a week's time to do the
needful and to comply office objections, subject to
payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- to the Advocates
Association Library Fund, High Court of Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench, Dharwad and the matter was ordered to
be listed today.
The matter is listed today. There is no
representation on behalf of the petitioner and the
petitioner has not filed memo regarding payment of cost
and has not even complied the office objections and not
paid the process fee also.
As already noted above, though the matter is called
twice, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MRK
