Lalitabai W/O Basanagouda Patil vs The State Of Karnataka
2022 Latest Caselaw 12959 Kant

                             1




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

        DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022

                          BEFORE

         THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

       REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100692 OF 2019

BETWEEN:

1.      LALITABAI
        W/O BASANAGOUDA PATIL
        AGE: 85 YEARS,
        OCC; HOUSEHOLD,
        R/O: VIDYANAGAR,
        MARIYANA TIMMASAGAR
        VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI.

2.      BASANAGOUDA MALLANAGOUDA PATIL
        SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.

2a.     SOMANAGOUDA BASANAGOUDA PATIL
        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,

2b.     MRUTHYUNJAY BASANAGOUDA PATIL
        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,

2c.     PUJA JAVALI
        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,

2d.     UMA K.S.
        AGE: MAJOR,
        OCC: BUSINESS,

        ALL ARE R/O: VIDYANAGAR,
        MARIYANA TIMMASAGAR,
        VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI.             ...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI SHIVARAJ C. BELLAKKI, ADVOCATE)
                              2




AND:

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       R/BY ITS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
       DHARWAD.

2.     THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
       DHARWAD.

3.     THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER
       HUBBALLI.

4.     THE HUBBALLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL
       CORPORATION,
       R/BY ITS COMMISSIONER
       HUBBALLI.

5.     L.A.PATIL
       AGE: MAJOR OCC: AGRI
       R/O: MARIYAN TIMMASAGAR
       VIDYANAGAR HUBBALLI.

6.     SHANKARGOUDA LINGANAGOUDA PATIL
       AGE: 73 YES, OCC: BUSINES AND AGRIL,
       R/O: BINDAVAN KRUPA H.N.120,
       VIDYANAGAR HUBBALLI.

7.     SMT. SHARADABAI
       W/O RUDRAGOUDA PATIL
       AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
       R/O: KARADAGI, TQ: SAVANUR.
       DIST: HAVERI.

8.     SMT. VIJAYA
       W/O TATYASAHEB PATIL
       AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
       C/OP.B. PATIL, HALLIKERI, GULEDAPPAS HOUSE
       VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI.

9.     VIRUPAXGOUDA LINGANAGOUDA PATIL
       AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE,
       R/O: BRINDAVAN KRUPA H.NO.120,
       VIDYANAGAR HUBBALLI.
                              3




10.   VIRUPAXGOUDA SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL
      AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O: 2ND CROSS NEAR SAID TEMPLE,
      JAY NAGAR, DHARWAD.

11.   MALLANGOUDA SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL
      AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
      R/O: MAMDAPUR POL, KANNUR,
      TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST. HAVERI.

12.   GURUSIDDAGOUDA SHIVANAGOUDA PATIL
      AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE OF MUTTAGI,
      R/O: TQ. KALAGHATGI.
                                          ... RESPONDENTS

      THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 22.12.2009 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE
(SR.DN.) HUBBALLI IN O.S.NO.244/2000 AND THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2015 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DIST
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD SITTING AT HUBBALLI IN
R.A.NO.40/2010.

      THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL POSTED FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                         ORDER

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the

appeal was listed on 20.10.2022. On that day, finally two

weeks time was granted to comply office objections failing

which, the appeal was ordered to be listed for dismissal on

10.11.2022.

The appeal is listed today. So far office objections are

not complied with.

In view of earlier peremptory order dated:20.10.2022,

the Regular Second appeal is dismissed for non-

compliance of office objections.

Sd/-

JUDGE

TKN