Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12939 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA
M.F.A. NO.100451/2014 (LAC)
BETWEEN
1. ARUDHA S/O LAKKAPPA KENCHANNAVAR
@ KEMPANNAVAR,
AGE: MAJOR,OCC: HOSEHOLD WORK,
R/O:SIMIKERI, TQ:DIST:BAGALKOT
2. MAHADEVAPPA S/O LAKKAPPA KENCHANNAVAR
@ KEMPANNAVAR,
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O:SIMIKERI, TQ:DIST:BAGALKOT
..... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI JAGADISH PATIL, ADV.)
AND
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BAGALKOT.
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
UKP, BAGALKOT.
3. K.B.J.N.L., ALMATTI.
..... RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.54(1) OF LA ACT,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD:19.10.2013
PASSED IN LAC.NO.149/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., BAGALKOT,
2
PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed on 04.02.2014 with several
defects. Though initially statutory period of six weeks time
was granted for removal of office objections, objections
were not removed. Hence this appeal was posted before
the Court on 02.07.2014, 31.07.2014, 20.08.2014 and
23.09.2014. On all these occasions though sufficient time
was granted, office objections were not removed. Today
when the matter was called out at 10.30 a.m., there was
no representation for the appellant, so also again in the
afternoon at 4.40 p.m., when it was called for second time.
Hence, this Court find no justifiable grounds to grant
further time. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for non-
compliance of office objections.
SD/-
JUDGE Naa
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!