Sri Basappa vs Sri Durgappa
2022 Latest Caselaw 12936 Kant

                            1




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                    DHARWAD BENCH

       DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022

                         BEFORE

         THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

       REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.158 OF 2007

BETWEEN:

SRI BASAPPA S/O SRI. HANUMAPPA
@ HANUMANTHAPPA @ DODDA HANUMANTHAPPA
HONNAPPANAVAR
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
WORKING IN H.P.F., KUMARAPATNAM,
R/O: KAVALETTU, RANEBENNUR TALUK,
HAVERI DIST-581110.
                                             ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI S.N.ALUR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )

AND:

SRI DURGAPPA S/O SRI SANNA HONNAPPA
HONNAPPANAVAR
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST, R/O KAVALETTU,
RANEBENNUR TALUK-581110.
                                           ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI BASAVARAJ M. MEKKI, ADVOCATE)

       THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
100 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.11.2006 AND
12.12.2006 RESPECTIVELY, IN R.A.NO.76/2001, PASSED BY THE
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), RANEBENNUR, REVERSING THE
JUDGMENT      AND    DECREE     DATED    25.09.2001,   IN
O.S.NO.46/1995, PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND
I ADDL. J.M.F.C., RANEBENNUR, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL,
ETC.,.
                              2




     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                         ORDER

There is no representation on behalf of appellant.

The captioned appeal is listed in until disposal list

from 07.11.2022. Whenever the matter was called, there

was no representation on behalf of appellant. Today also

there is no representation on behalf of appellant.

As could be seen from the appeal papers, the

appeal is filed in the year 2007. Now we are in the month

of November 2022. The appeal is pending for almost

fifteen years.

As already noted above, though matter was called

on 07.11.2022, 08.11.2022 and today, there is no

representation on behalf of appellant. Hence, this Regular

Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE MRK