Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12801 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
M.S.A. NO.100114 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
PARIXIT S/O RAMACHANDRA
@ TATYA DESHPANDE,
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.,
1. SMT. PRATIBHA
W/O PARIXIT DESHPANDE,
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O NAGARAL VILLAGE, BILAGI TALUK,
BAGALKOTE DISTRICT.
2. SRI PRAVEEN
S/O PARIXIT DESHPANDE
AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRIL,
R/O NAGARAL VILLAGE, BILAGI TALUK,
BAGALKOTE DISTRICT.
3. SRI. PRADEEP
S/O PARIXIT DESHPANDE,
AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: AGRIL.,
R/O NAGARAL VILLAGE, BILAGI TALUK,
BAGALKOTE DISTRICT.
4. SMT. ASHWINI
D/O PARIXIT DESHPANDE
AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O NAGARAL VILLAGE, BILAGI TALUK,
BAGALKOTE DISTRICT.
ALL THE APPELLANTS ARE REP. BY THEIR
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
2
SRI. RAJENDRA S/O SYAMRAO DESHPANDE
AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRIL,
R/O NAGARAL VILLAGE-587113,
BILAGAI TALUK, BAGALKOTE DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
(APPELLANTS NO. 1 TO 4 (ABSENT))
AND:
1. SRI.KIRAN
S/O SHANKARRAO BAGALKOTE
AGE : 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O BILAGI-587116, BAGALKOTE TALUK
UMA W/O SHANKARAO BAGALKOT
SINCE DECEASED BY L.RS.,
ALREADY ON RECORD.
2. SMT. VIDYA W/O PRAMOD JARATI
AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O BILAGI-587116, BAGALKOTE TALUK.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VISHWANATH HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
THIS MISCELLANOUS SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
ORDER XLIII RULE 1(U)OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908,
CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALAKOTE, DATED
27.08.2019, IN R.A.NO.67/2012, REVERSING THE ORDER DATED
13.07.2012, ON I.A.NO.XI IN E.P.NO.04/2005, PASSED BY THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BILAGI, ETC.,.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
The captioned appeal was listed on 18.10.2022 and
the Court permitted the counsel on record to retire from
the case. Consequently, directed the office to show the
name of appellants in the cause list. Accordingly names of
appellants are shown in the cause list. The names of
appellants shown in the cause list are called out. No
representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the
appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MRK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!