Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12793 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.9304 OF 2022 (KLR - RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. NARAYANAMMA,
W/O LATE GUDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
2. SRI. B. G. ANIL KUMAR,
S/O LATE GUDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
BOTH R/AT BAGALUR VILLAGE,
JALA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BANGALORE - 562 149.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SMT.INDUMATHI S.R., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
REVENUE SECRETARY,
VIDHANASOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,
BANGALORE KANDHAYA BHAVANA,
K G ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 009.
2
3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE NORTH,
KANDHAYA BHAVANA,
K G ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 009.
4. THE TAHSILDAR,
YELAHANKA,
BANGALORE - 560 063.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.R.SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R2
TO 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.12.2021
VIDE ANNEXURE - F1, F2 AND F3 FOR CONDUCTING THE
SURVEY IN RESPECT OF 4 ACRES OF LAND GRANTED IN
FAVOUR OF GUNDAPPA IN SY.NO.176, BLOCK NO.51 OF
BAGALUR VILLAGE AS PER A T RAMASWAMY COMMITTEE
REPORT AND TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE ENTRIES IN THE
REVENUE RECORDS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The subject matter of this Writ Petition is substantially
similar to the one in W.P.No.24601/2022 between
L.D.KRISHNAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER
disposed off by this court vide judgment of the day wherein
certain favourable observations have been made in favour
of the litigant therein.
2. The Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.932-
933/1974 between A.V.VINODA & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF
KARNATAKA BY ITS COMMISSIONER & SECRETARY
disposed off on 11.12.1974, has held that the Court should
treat like-cases alike and if relief is granted to a litigant,
similar relief cannot be denied to other similarly
circumstanced litigants, there being no derogatory
circumstances.
In view of the above, similar case needs to be treated
similarly and therefore, the relief granted to the litigant in
the cognate writ petition is extended to the petitioner
herein as well, mutatis mutandis. Writ Petition is disposed
off, costs having been made easy.
Sd/-
JUDGE DS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!