Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12785 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.645 OF 2008 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. HANAMAGOUDA
S/O BASANAGOUDA ANWERI,
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs.
1(a). CHANNABASAMMA
W/O HANAMAGOUDA ANWERI,
AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC:AGRIL & HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O LINGADEVARKOPPA,
TAL:HIREKERUR - 581 111,
DISTRICT HAVERI.
1(b). BASANAGOUDA
S/O HANAMAGOUDA ANWERI,
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC:AGRIL,
R/O LINGADEVARKOPPA,
TAL:HIREKERUR - 581 111,
DISTRICT HAVERI.
1(c). GADIGEPPA
S/O HANAMAGOUDA ANWERI,
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC:AGRIL,
R/O LINGADEVARKOPPA,
TAL:HIREKERUR - 581 111,
DISTRICT HAVERI.
1(d). SMT.ANNAPURAVVA
W/O BASAVANNEPPA NANDIGAVI,
AGE:50 YEARS, OCC:AGRIL & HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O GUDDADABEVINAHALLI,
TALUKA - HIREKERUR - 581 111,
2
DIST: HAVERI.
1(e). RAMAPPA
S/O SHIVANANDAPPA NESWI,
AGE:32 YEARS, OCC: AGRI,
R/O LINGADEVARKOPPA,
TAL:HIREKERUR - 581 111,
DIST:HAVERI.
1(f). UJJAPPA
S/O SHIVANANDAPPA NESWI,
AGE:30 YEARS, OCC:AGRI,
R/O LINGADEVARKOPPA,
TAL:HIREKERUR - 581 111,
DIST.HAVERI.
1(g). SMT.BASAVVA
W/O KARABASAPPA HEDIYAL,
AGE:30 YEARS, OCC:AGRIL & HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O GUDDADABEVINAHALLI,
TALUKA - HIREKERUR - 581 111,
DIST: HAVERI. ...APPELLANTS
[BY SRI.R.S.KADIBAGIL, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
1. VEERABHADRAPPA
S/O RUDRAPPA BATTER,
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs.
1(a). SMT.RUDRAMMA
W/O VEERABHADRAPPA BATTER,
SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRs.
1(b). MANJAPPA
S/O SHIVAPPA TIMLAPUR,
AGE:25 YEARS,
OCC:AGRIL,
R/O LINGADEVARKOPPA,
TAL:HIREKERUR - 581 111,
DIST:HAVERI.
3
1(c). RUDRAPPA
S/O SHIVAPPA TIMLAPUR,
AGE:22 YEARS, OCC:AGRIL,
R/O LINGADEVARKOPPA,
TAL:HIREKERUR - 581 111,
DIST:HAVERI.
1(d). SMT.GOURAVVA
W/O VEERAPPA MULIMANI,
DEAD. ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI AVINASH BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1(b) & (c))
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
100 OF CPC, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
10.02.2007 PASSED BY THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.),
ITINERATE IN R.A.NO.66/2002 AND DISMISS THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 30.09.2002 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE
(JR.DN.) IN O.S.NO.234/1993.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of appellants.
The captioned appeal is listed in until disposal list.
On 02.11.2022, when the matter was called, there was
no representation on behalf of appellants. Today also
there is no representation on behalf of appellants.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the
appeal is filed in the year 2008. Now we are in the month
of November 2022. The appeal is pending for almost
fourteen years.
As already noted above, though matter was called
yesterday and today, there is no representation on behalf
of appellants. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
TKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!