Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. Nandlal T. Nandwani vs Smt. Komala
2022 Latest Caselaw 5872 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5872 Kant
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Mr. Nandlal T. Nandwani vs Smt. Komala on 31 March, 2022
Bench: E.S.Indireshpresided Byesij
                         1



 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2022

                      BEFORE

       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

     WRIT PETITION NO.5865 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

MR. NANDLAL T. NANDWANI
SON OF TEEK CHAND NANDWANI
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT NO.62 LAVELLE ROAD
5TH CROSS ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY
SMT. MITHILA BAI
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
D/O N. INDERCHAND
                                      ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SARAVANA S, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   SMT. KOMALA
     WIFE OF CHIKKANNA
     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
     R/A NO.24, SRI VIGNESHWARA NILAYA
     3RD CROSS, JAYAKUMAR LAYOUT
     BEHIND GOVT. PRIMARY HEALTH CENTER
     KONANAKUNTE, BANGALORE-62.

2.   SMT. MANJULA
     WIFE OF MANTHESHA
     AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
     R/A NO.299, 6TH MAIN
     2ND CROSS, ATTUR LAYOUT
                             2


     YALAHANKA,
     BANGALORE-560106.

3.   SUKANYA
     D/O LATE N A MAYANNA
     AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
     R/AT NO.25, 1ST MAIN
     AMBEDKAR LAYOUT
     KAVAL BYRASANDRA
     R T NAGAR POT
     BANGALORE-560032.

4.   N M DHANALAKSHMI @ N M PREMA
     W/O CHANDRASHEKAR
     D/O LATE N A MAYANNA
     AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
     R/AT NO.25, 1ST MAIN
     AMBEDKAR LAYOUT
     KAVAL BYRASANDRA, R T NAGAR POST
     BANGALORE-560032.

5.   N M JAYASHREE @ N M KAMAKSHI
     WIFE OF JAYARAMAIAH
     D/O LATE N. A. MAYANNA
     AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
     NO.F-6 III CROSS
     KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD COLONY
     BAGNALROE-560079.

6.   N. M. MEENAKSHI
     WIFE OF N. SOMASHEKAR
     D/O N. A. MAYANNA
     R/AT NO.5 BILIGIRI
     RAMAIAH LAYOUT
     DODDAGUBBI POST
     BYATHI VILLAGE
     BENGALURU-562149.

7.   N M LOKAPRAKASH
     S/O LATE N A MAYANA
     AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
                           3


     NO.496, 111 APPAYANNA COMPLEX
     T C H COLLEGE ROAD
     NAGAWARA, BANGALORE-45.

8.   N M CHANDRASHEKAR
     SON OF LATE MAYANNA
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
     NO.60 SUMUKHA NILAYA
     ISRO LAYOUT, BIKASIPURA
     BANGALORE-61.

9.   N VANAJAKSHI
     WIFE OF N A MAYANNA
     AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
     NO.1915, 31ST CROSS
     13TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI II STAGE
     BANGALORE-560070.

10 . CHETAN PRAKASH
     SON OF N A MAYANNA
     AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
     NO.1915, 31ST CROSS
     13TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI II STAGE
     BANGALORE-70.

11 . REKHA N M
     WIFE OF KRISHNAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
     NO.165, ANNAPOORNESHWARI NILAYA
     ST. MICHAEL SCHOOL ROAD
     KANAKAPURA TOWN
     RAMANAGARAM-562159.

12 . ANITHA N M
     WIFE OF BASAVARAJU
     AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
     C.60, OFFICERS QUARTERS
     K G F KOLAR DISTRICT, K G F-563115.

13 . RAGHAVENDRA B V
     S/O UMASHANKAR
                             4


    AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
    T C H COLLEGE ROAD
    NAGAVARA, BANGALORE-45.

14 . MUNIYAMMAL
     WIFE OF LATE VENU
     AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
     R/A NO.6/3 MARIYAMMA -1
     KOYAL STREET, JAI BHARATHI NAGAR
     BANGALORE-560033.
                                     ....RESPONDENTS

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT
THE XXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE (COURT
HALL 6) FOR EARLY DISPOSAL OF THE O.S.NO.3711/2012
IN TERMS OF THE DIRECTION ISSUED IN R.F.A NO.
684/2013 AS PER ANNX-B, WITHIN A MAXIMUM TIME
PERIOD OF 3 MONTHS, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                        ORDER

This writ petition is filed by the

petitioner/defendant No.13 in O.S.No.3711/2012 on

the file of the XXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions

Judge, Bengaluru (for short, hereinafter referred to as

'trial Court') seeking consideration of the application in

I.A-16 filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with

Section 151 of C.P.C., to modify the interim order

dated 02.03.2018.

2. I have heard Sri. Saravana S., learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner/defendant No.13.

3. Sri. Sarvana S., learned counsel appearing

for the defendant No.13, drew the attention of the

Court to the judgment and decree passed by this Court

in R.F.A.No.684/2013 (PAR) dated 25.06.2015

(Annexure-B), and also the order on the application

dated 02.03.2018 by the trial Court (Annexure-C) and

sought for modification of the interim order dated

02.03.2018, by restricting the injunction order to the

extent of his share as claimed by the defendant No.10.

In this regard, he submitted that the defendant No.13

has filed an application as per Annexure-D and same

has to be considered.

4. Having taken note of the grounds and the

urgency pleaded by the petitioner/defendant No.13.

I am of the view that, if the trial Court be requested to

consider Annexure-D i.e., Application I.A-16 filed by

the defendant No.13, at the earliest and dispose of the

same within a period of three months from the date of

receipt of copy of this order., the same shall meet the

ends of justice. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed

of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

GRD/PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter