Sachin Prabhakar vs Anjanadevi Sachin
2022 Latest Caselaw 5188 Kant

                           1




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                   DHARWAD BENCH

        DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF MARCH 2022

                       PRESENT

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR

         REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.100134/2016


BETWEEN:

1.   SACHIN PRABHAKAR GUNDAKALLE @ PATIL,
     AGE 42 YEARS,OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O: YAMAKANAMARADI, TQ: HUKKERI,
     DIST: BELAGAVI, NOW AT BAGALCHOWK,
     KOLHAPUR. 410 003

2.   SANDEEP PRABHAKAR GUNDAKALLE @ PATIL,
     AGE 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O: YAMAKANAMARADI,
     TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI,
     NOW AT BAGALCHOWK, KOLHAPUR. 410 003

3.   SUDHEER PRABHAKAR GUNDAKALLE @ PATIL,
     AGE 38 YEARS,OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O: YAMAKANAMARADI, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST: BELAGAVI, NOW AT BAGALCHOWK,
     KOLHAPUR. 410 003

4.   SUGANDHA PRABHAKAR GUNDAKALLE @ PATIL,
     AGE 69 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O: YAMAKANAMARADI, TQ: HUKKERI,
     DIST: BELAGAVI,
      NOW AT BAGALCHOWK,
     KOLHAPUR. 410 003
                             2




5.   SHOBHA BAJARANG CHANDRAKUDE,
     AGE 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O: PRABHUWADI, CHIKKODI,
     DIST: BELAGAVI. 590 001

6.   MANISHA DEEPAK GADAGANE,
     AGE 34 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O: YAMAKANAMARADI, TQ: HUKKERI,
     DIST: BELAGAVI, NOW AT BAGALCHOWK,
     KOLHAPUR. 410 003
                                          .. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SURESH P. HUDEDAGADDI, ADV.)



AND:

1.   ANJANADEVI SACHIN GUDAKALLE @ PATIL,
     AGE 30 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK,
     R/O GANESHWADI, TQ GOKAK,
     DIST BELAGAVI. 590 001

2.   KUM.SAKSHI SACHIN GUDAKALLE @ PATIL,
     AGE: 11 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
     R/O: GANESHWADI, TQ: GOKAK,
     DIST: BELAGAVI. 590 001

3.   KUM.MEENAKSHI SACHIN GUDAKALLE @ PATIL,
     AGE: 10 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
     R/O: GANESHWADI, TQ: GOKAK,
     DIST: BELAGAVI. 590 001

4.   KUM.PREMKUMAR SACHIN GUDAKALLE @ PATIL,
     AGE: 7 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
     R/O: GANESHWADI, TQ: GOKAK,
     DIST: BELAGAVI. 590 001

     RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 BEING MINORS
     REP. BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND
     MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1.




5.   AKKAVVA LAXMAN GUNDAKALLE
     AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
                                 3




     R/O: NERLI, TQ: HUKKERI,
      DIST: BELAGAVI. 590 001

6.   BASAVVA CHANDRU PUJERI,
     AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
     R/O: KURNIWADI, TQ: HUKKERI,
     DIST: BELAGAVI. 590 001
                                     .. RESPONDENTS
(RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 6 SERVICE HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE
COURT ORDER DATED 4.2.2020.
RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE MINORS R/BY RESPONDENT NO.1.
RESPONDENT NO.5 SERVED)


      THIS RFA FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT     AND      DECREE    DTD:01.03.2016        PASSED     IN
O.S.NO.4/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
HUKKERI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION
AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.


      THIS   APPEAL   COMING    ON    FOR   ORDERS,    THIS    DAY,
H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:



                            ORDER

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that

respondent Nos.2 and 3 have become majors. To file

necessary application to discharge the minor guardian, in

spite of repeated requests, he has not got any instructions

from the appellants. Therefore, application is not filed.

Even though sufficient opportunities have been

granted, steps have not been taken. Hence, the appeal is

dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

kmv