Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5132 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
R.F.A NO.633 OF 2019(MON)
BETWEEN:
MR. JAYA PAUL VICTOR
SON OF CHINNAPPARAJ
VAILA GLASS AND PLYWOOD
612/4, K NARAYANAPURA CROSS
BAGALUR MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 077
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.RAJ PRABHU S, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
MR.JOHN C
SON OF CHINNAPAN
NO.213, SWISS TOWN,
SADAHALLI POST, BENGALURU-560 110
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.SUNIL PAUL, ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 R/W UNDER
SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.12.2018 PASSED
IN OS.NO.25436/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI ADDITIONAL
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT MAYOHALL BENGALURU,
DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
2
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This matter was listed on five occasions calling upon the
appellant to remove office objections. On the last date, there
was no representation. Therefore, this Court was compelled to
pass peremptory order to list this matter for dismissal in the
event the appellant fails to comply the office objections. Even
today, there is no representation. It appears the appellant is
not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
*alb/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!