Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Govindrao S/O Mukundrao Kulkarni ... vs The Chief Secretary And Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 3646 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3646 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Govindrao S/O Mukundrao Kulkarni ... vs The Chief Secretary And Ors on 4 March, 2022
Bench: Ashok S. Kinagi
                            1




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                 KALABURAGI BENCH

     DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022

                        BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI


             MFA No.200622/2016 (LAC)

Between:

Govindrao S/o Mukundarao Kulkarni Gopalrao,
(Both were deceased)
Choudappa Kollur - Present owner-
Deceased by his LR's (Referred in
Payment Register Extract)

1.   Neelamma W/o Choudappa Kollur,
     Age: 44 years, Occ: Household work,

2.   Manju S/o Choudappa Kollur,
     Age: 26 years, Occ: Agriculture,

3.   Sanju S/o Choudappa Kollur,
     Age: 22 years, Occ: Agriculture,

4.   Aswini D/o. Choudappa Kollur,
     Age: 22 years, Occ: Household work,

     All are R/o Kadani, Tq. Sindagi,
     Dist: Vijayapura.
                                                ... Appellants
(By Sri. Harshavardhan.R.Malipatil, Advocate)
                               2




And:

1.     The Chief Secretary,
       Government of Karnataka, Vidhana Soudha,
       Bengaluru (AGP)-560001.

2.     The Chief Administrative Officer,
       Karnataka Niravari Nigam Ltd.,
       Walmi Building, Belur-Belgaum Road,
       Dharwad-580 011.
3.     The Deputy Commissioner,
       Vijayapura (AGP)-586101.

4.     The Chief Executive Engineer,
       KNN BLI Division, Afzalpur,
       Tq. Afzalpur, Dist. Kalaburagi-585 102.

5.     The LAO / Asst. Commissioner,
       Indi (AGP)-586 209.
6.    The Principal Secretary,
      Revenue Department,
      Govt. of Karnataka, Bengaluru-560 001.
                                          ... Respondents
(By Smt. Maya.T.R, HCGP for R1, R3, R5 & R6;
By Sri. Gourish S.Khashampur, Advocate for R2 & R4)

      This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section
54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, praying to allow this
appeal with costs and modify the judgment and award
passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Sindagi dated
24.11.2014 in LAC No.20/2014 and fix Market Value at the
rate of Rs.8,00,000/- per acre and award all statutory
benefits and grant any other relief, which this Hon'ble
Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the
interest of justice and equity.

      This appeal coming on for admission, this day, the
Court delivered the following:-
                                 3




                            JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the appellants-claimants

under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for

short 'the Act') challenging the judgment and award

dated 24.11.2014 passed in LAC No.20/2014 by the

Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Sindagi (for short

hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal').

2. Facts giving rise to filing of this appeal are

as under:

The appellant was the owner of land bearing

Sy.No.68/2 measuring 1 acre 6 guntas of Kadani

village, Tq: Sindagi, Dist: Vijaypur. The said land was

acquired by respondent No.5 under preliminary

notification dated 15.12.2007, which was published in

the official gazette on 17.01.2008. Respondent No.5,

after due enquiry passed General award on

15.07.2011 and fixed the market value @ Rs.49,320/-

per acre for dry lands. The appellants being

dissatisfied with the compensation fixed by the

respondent No.5, filed an application under Section

18(2) of Land Acquisition Act. The respondent No.5

referred the applications to the Reference Court. The

Reference Court after recording the evidence and on

the basis of material on record enhanced the

compensation amount to Rs.6,75,000/- per acre

treating the acquired lands as irrigated lands. The

appellant being dissatisfied with the compensation

enhanced by the Reference Court has filed this appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits

the Division Bench of this Court in MFA

No.200621/2016 and connected matter, has enhanced

the compensation amount from Rs.6,75,000/- to

Rs.8,50,305/- per acre with all other statutory

benefits. He submits that the lands acquired in the

said appeal is under the same notification and all the

lands are situated in the Kadani Village. He submits

that this appeal may be disposed off in terms of the

judgment passed in the aforesaid appeal.

4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for

the respondent Nos.2 and 4 submits that the Division

Bench of this Court in MFA No.200621/2016 and

connected matter, has enhanced the compensation

amount from Rs.6,75,000/- to Rs.8,50,305/- per acre

with all other statutory benefits. He submits this

appeal may be disposed off in terms of the aforesaid

judgment.

     5.     However,    learned   HCGP      adopts    the

arguments     made     by   the   learned   counsel   for

respondent Nos.2 and 4.


6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for

the parties and perused the records.

7. It is not in dispute that the appellants are

the owners of land bearing Sy.No.68/2 measuring 1

acre 6 guntas of Kadani Village. The said land was

acquired by respondent No.5 under preliminary

notification dated 15.12.2007, and general award

came to be passed on 15.07.2011 by fixing the

market value @ Rs.49,320/- per acre treating the

lands under acquisition as dry lands. The appellants

being dissatisfied with the compensation fixed by the

respondent No.5, filed an application under Section

18(2) of Land Acquisition Act. The respondent No.5

referred the applications to the Reference Court. After

recording the evidence and on the basis of material on

record, the Reference Court has enhanced the

compensation of amount from Rs.49,320/- to

Rs.6,75,000/- per acre.

8. The Division Bench of this Court in MFA

No.200621/2016 and connected matter, has enhanced

the compensation amount from Rs.6,75,000/- to

Rs.8,50,305/- per acre with all other statutory

benefits. The land under acquisition in MFA

No.200621/2016 and land in acquisition are acquired

under the same notification. The said lands are

situated in the same village. The appellants are also

entitled for the same benefits as in MFA

No.200621/2016. Thus, the appellants are entitled for

the enhancement of Rs.8,50,305/- per acre with all

other statutory benefits.

9. In view of the above discussions, the

appeal is allowed in part with costs.

The market value of the acquired lands

belonging to appellants is fixed at Rs.8,50,035/- per

acre with all other statutory benefits.

The appellants/claimants are held not entitled for

any interest for the delay period of 395 days in

preferring this appeal.

The appellants are granted six weeks time to pay

the differential Court fee on enhanced amount.

Sd/-

JUDGE msr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter