Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9374 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2022
-1-
CCC No. 100053 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT
CCC NO. 100053 OF 2022 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
SMT. M.V.RAJAMMA,
W/O LATE SHRI SURESH VADAKANNAVAR,
AGE 72 YEARS, R/A. D.NO. 2162,
KODAGINA MUTT ROAD,
2ND CROSS, BASAVESHWAR NAGAR,
K.R.MOHALLA, MYSORE.
... COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ C.BELLAKKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. DR. S. RAVISHANKAR,
THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE,
VAKKALIGARA HOSTEL BUILDING,
HUDSON CIRCLE,
BANGALORE.
Digitally signed
by ROHAN
HADIMANI T
ROHAN
HADIMANI
T
Location:
DHARWAD
Date:
2. VANAJAKSHI,
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE,
2022.06.23
12:01:28
+0530
UTTAR KANNADA, KARWAR.
-2-
CCC No. 100053 of 2022
3. K. GOPALAIAH,
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
EXCISE DEPARTMENT,
KARNATAKA STATE GOVERNMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BENGALURU-01.
... ACCUSED
(BY SMT. K. VIDYAVATHI, AAG FOR
SRI. PRASHANTH MOGALI, HCGP FOR A3;
A1 SERVED)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215
OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING THIS
HON'BLE COURT TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS
ACT FOR HAVING WILLFULLY DISOBEYED THE
DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT BY ORDER
DATED 11.07.2013 IN WP.NO.62312/2012 C/W
C.P.NO.581/2012 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A, IN THE
ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
KRISHNA S. DIXIT, J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The short grievance of the complainant is as to
non-compliance of the Writ of a learned Single Judge
CCC No. 100053 of 2022
of this Court issued in Writ Petition No.62312/2012 (S-
RES) connected with C.P.No.581/2012 disposed off on
11.07.2013. The judgment copy is at Annexure-A.
2. After service of notice, the accused officials
have entered appearance through learned AAG. This
Court by order dated 07.06.2022 had issued the
following direction:
"The contemnors are directed to release 50% of the terminal benefits payable on account of death of Suresh Vadakannavar and 50% of the arrears of family pension due, till the death of Smt. Rajani and thereafter full family pension payable in favour of the present complainant within two weeks from today."
3. Learned AAG appearing for the accused
submits that now the arrears of pension, family
pension and terminal benefits have been released to
the complainant and that in terms of the letter dated
18.06.2022 addressed to the Accountant General, a
copy whereof is at document No.2 in the memo, all
CCC No. 100053 of 2022
arrears of family pension that have accrued due on the
dates specified therein and subsequently would be
released to the complainant.
4. The following paragraphs in the document
No.2 read as under:
"ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DzÉñÀzÀAvÉ ²æÃªÀÄw JA.« gÁdªÀÄä EªÀjUÉ ¢ªÀAUÀvÀ ¸ÀÄgÉÃ±ï ªÀqÀPÀtÚªÀgï EªÀgÀ ªÀÄgÀt ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw gÀd¤ , ªÀÄgÀtºÉÆA¢zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀzÀªÀgÉUÉ CAzÀgÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 23.11.2009 jAzÀ 02.07.2018 gÀªÀgÉUÉ 50% PÀÄlÄA§ ¦AZÀtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 03.07.2018 jAzÀ ¥ÀÆtð PÀÄlÄA§ ¦AZÀtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ²æÃªÀÄw JA.« gÁdªÀÄä gÀªÀjUÉ ¥ÁªÀw¸À¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ,
DzÀÝjAzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw JA.« gÁdªÀÄä EªÀjUÉ ¢ªÀAUÀvÀ ¸ÀÄgÉÃ±ï ªÀqÀPÀtÚªÀgï EªÀgÀ ªÀÄgÀt ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw gÀd¤, ªÀÄgÀtºÉÆA¢zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀzÀªÀgÉUÉ CAzÀgÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ 22.11.2009 jAzÀ 02.07.2018 gÀªÀgÉUÉ 50% PÀÄlÄA§ ¦AZÀtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 03.07.2018 jAzÀ ¥ÀÆtð PÀÄlÄA§ ¦AZÀtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ²æÃªÀÄw JA.« gÁdªÀÄä gÀªÀjUÉ vÀÄvÁðV ¥ÁªÀw¸À®Ä ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄPÉÊUÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖªÀjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¤zÉÃð±À£À ¤ÃqÀ®Ä PÉÆÃgÀÄvÁÛ , ¸ÀzÀj £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ ¥Àæw ºÁUÀÆ ²æÃªÀÄw JA. «. gÁdªÀÄä EªÀjUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¨ÁåAPï «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄÆ® ¸ÉêÁªÀ»AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
F ¥ÀvÀæzÉÆA¢UÉ ®UÀwÛ¹ ¸À°è¹zÉ. "
In the above circumstances, there being
substantial compliance of the Writ and a solemn
CCC No. 100053 of 2022
assurance to comply whatever remainder of it, we
drop the contempt proceedings with a warning that in
the event the assurance given by the accused Nos.1
&2 is not discharged within two weeks, the
complainant may seek revival of these proceedings for
the aggravated contempt of this Court. The serious
consequences of aggravated contempt need not be
mentioned here.
If there is any other dispute, it is open to the
complainant to seek redressal of the same elsewhere
in accordance with law and all contentions in that
regard are kept open.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
RH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!