Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9068 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2022
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
RFA NO.440/2019(PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MANJUNATH S.M.
S/O LATE CHIKKA MUGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 30 YERS,
R/AT S.N. 30, SADARAMANGALA VILLAGE,
KADUGODI POST
BENGALURU-560 067
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. AMARESH.A. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. AKKAYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
W/O LATE CHIKKA MUGAPPA
2. SRI VENKATESH S M
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.157
1ST CROSS, SADARAMANGALA VILLAGE
KADUGODI POST
BENGALURU-560067
3. SMT VENKATALAKSHMAMMA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/AT SUNUVARA VANAKANHALLI
GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
-2-
4. SMT NAGAMMA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
W/O THIMMARAYAPPA
R/AT SINGASANDRA VILLAGE
HOSA ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI
BENGALURU
5. SRI MUNIVEERAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
S/O LATE VAJRAPPA
R/AT NO.5TH MAIN
WILSON GARDEN
BENGALURU-560 030
6. SMT VENKATAMMA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
W/O LATE KEMPANNA
R/AT C/O MARAPPA
BALLUR VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI
ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
7. SMT NARAYANAMMA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/AT THIRUPALYA VILLAGE,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST
JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
8. SRI TALAMANCHI NARASA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
S/O LAKHMANA REDDY
R/AT NO.006 16TH MAIN B CORSS
CAMDEN CASTLE 1ST MAIN
PAI LAYOUT, BENNINGANAHALLI
BENALURU -560 016
BENALURU EAST TALUK
9. SRI A GOPAL @ GOPAL REDDY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
-3-
10. SRI A SRINIVAS REDDY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
BOTH ARE SONS OF
LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH REDDY
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.438
MARATHALLI, NEAR CANARA BANK
BENGALURU-560 037
11. SMT CHINNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
W/O LATE RAMAIAH
R/AT NO.24 4TH CROSS,
NEAR SRI ATTI MARAMMA DEVASTHANA
DOMLUR BENGALURU-560 071
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41
RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 03.11.2018 PASSED IN OS.NO.446/2011 ON THE FILE
OF THE I ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL
DISTRICT, BANGALORE DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
DECLARATION, PARTITION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits
that having regard to the fact that valuation of the suit before
the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District,
Bangalore, was shown as Rs.6,00,000/-, appeal would lie
before the District Court, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore
in terms of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act,
1964. Hence, he submits that appellant may be permitted to
withdraw the appeal with liberty to file an appeal before the
District Court by giving the appellant benefit of Section 14 of
the Limitation Act.
2. Submission of the appellant's counsel is placed on
record. Accordingly, appellant is permitted to withdraw the
appeal with liberty to file an appropriate appeal before the
District Court within four (4) weeks from today. If such an
appeal is filed within four (4) weeks from today, appellant
would be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation
Act.
3. Registry is directed to return the papers to the
learned counsel for the appellant forthwith to enable the
appellant to comply with this order.
SD/-
JUDGE
DR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!