Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8771 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRL. R. P. NO.100160/2016
C/W CRL.R.P.No.696/2016
IN CRL.R.P. NO.100160 OF 2016
BETWEEN
SHRI.PUNDALIK S/O JANABA BHOGAN,
AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: SANGAM COLD DRINK HOUSE,
NEAR 1ST RAILWAY GATE, DESHMUK ROAD,
TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI,
TQ and DIST: BELAGAVI.
.....PETITIONER
(BY SRI SANTOSH B RAWOOT, ADV.)
AND
SHRI.A. BALIKRISHNA KALLURAYA,
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: PLOT NO.246, 4TH CROSS,
CHIDAMBAR NAGAR, BELAGAVI,
TQ: DIST: BELAGAVI.
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SHREEVATSA S HEGDE, ADV.)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W
SEC.401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI
CONVICTING THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE U/SEC. 138 OF N.I.ACT,
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 69/2013, DATED 29/04/2016, ALLOWING THE
APPEAL BY MODIFYING THE SENTENCE OF CONVICTION PASSED IN
2
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 2900/2010 DATED 21/03/2013, PASSED BY IV
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. BELAGAVI, BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION BY DISMISSING THE COMPLAINANT FILED BY THE
RESPONDENT.
IN CRL.R.P. NO.696 OF 2016
BETWEEN
SHRI PUNDALIK S/O. JANABA BHOGAN,
AGED MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
S/O. SANGAM COLD DRINK HOUSE,
NEAR I RAILWAY GATE, DESHMUKH ROAD,
TILAKWADI,
BELAGAVI 590001
.....PETITIONER
(BY SRI SANTOSH B RAWOOT, ADV.)
AND
1. SHRI A BALKRISHNA KALLURAYA
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
1A) SRI ANKIT KALLURAYA
AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
1B) SMT. MEGHA KALLURAYA
AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
BOTH R/O.#246, 4TH CROSS,
RAJARAM MARG, CHIDAMBAR NAGAR,
BELAGAVI.
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SHREEVATSA S HEGDE, ADV.)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE
FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE
PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION AND
SENTENCE PASSED BY THE IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. AT
BELAGAVI IN C.C.NO.2900/2010 DATED 21.03.2013 AND CONFIRMED IN
CRL.A.NO.65/2013 DATED 29.04.2016 ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. S.J.,
BELAGAVI.
3
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL
HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE
THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for revision petitioner has filed memos
withdrawing both the petitions and submits that the parties have
settled the dispute outside the Court. Therefore, the petitioner is
not interested in prosecuting the matter.
His submission and memos are placed on record.
Accordingly, both the revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending Interlocutory Applications are disposed off as they do
not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Naa
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!