Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11181 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2022
-1-
MFA No. 101984 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD
BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101984/2022
(MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD
UMA MAHESHWARA RAO BUILDING,
STATION ROAD, HOSPETE,
DIST. BELLARY, KARNATAKA.
PIN-583201.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. NIRMALA
W/O. LATE BASAPPA REVANKI,
AGE. 22 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD
2. SHIVAPPA S/O. BASAPPA REVANKI
AGE. 59 YEARS,
OCC. AGRICULTURIST.
3. SMT. BASAMMA W/O. SHIVAPPA REVANKI
AGE. 48 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/O. YEREHANCHINAL,
TQ. YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL.
PIN CODE-583236.
-2-
MFA No. 101984 of 2022
4. RAJABHAKSHI S/O. AHMMED SAB
AGE. MAJOR,
OCC. DRIVER OF LORRY BEARING NO. KA-35/A-7984
R/O. NARASAPUR MAGANI,
HOSAPETE, DIST. BELLARY.
PIN CODE-583201
5. S. GURUSHARAN SINGH S/O. HARIDRAN SING
PLOT. NO. 24/15TH WARD,
N.C. COLONY, BEHIND WEAR TANK,
HOSAPETE, TQ. WEF-2-7014
DIST. BALLARI. PIN CODE-583201.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.V.PATTAR, ADVOCAET FOR C/R1 TO R3,
NOTICE TO R4 & R5 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT,
1988, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS CONNECTED WITH MVC
NO. 157/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT YELBURGA,
EXAMINE THE SAME AND MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED 19.03.2022 BY REDUCING THE COMPENSATION TO THE JUST
LEVEL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel appearing for both the parties.
2. Though this appeal is listed for admission today,
with the consent of both the parties, it is taken up for final
disposal.
MFA No. 101984 of 2022
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo seeking dispensation of notice to respondent Nos.4
and 5. In view of the memo, notice to the said
respondents is dispensed with at the risk of the appellant.
4. The present appeal is filed by the insurance
company questioning the quantum of compensation
awarded by the Tribunal to the tune of Rs.28,48,272/-.
5. Factual matrix of the case of the claimants
before the Tribunal is that deceased-Basappa was working
in JSW factory as labour and he was getting salary of
Rs.20,000/- per month and the family members have lost
the bread earner of the family due to the accident
occurred on 29.07.2017 and hence claimed compensation
of Rs.65,25,000/-.
6. The claimants are the wife and parents of the
deceased. To substantiate their claim, claimant No.1
examined herself as PW.1 and got marked documents as
Exs.P.1 to P.8. On the other hand, respondent has
MFA No. 101984 of 2022
examined two witnesses as RWs.1 and 2 and got marked
documents as Exs.R.1 to R.4.
7. The very contention of the insurance company
before this Court is that the Tribunal has taken the income
of the deceased at Rs.13,250/- without any basis. To
substantiate the fact that the deceased was working in
JSW factory and was having income of Rs.20,000/- per
month, no documents are placed before the Court. It is
further contended that the income assessed by the
Tribunal is on the higher side.
8. Learned counsel for appearing for the insurance
company brought to the notice of this Court that in the
absence of any documents, the Court has to make guess
work by considering the notional income in terms of the
chart prepared by the Karnataka State Legal Services
Authority and as per the said chart the notional income
would be Rs.10,250/- in respect of an accidental claim of
the year 2017. Hence, the same needs to be modified by
this Court.
MFA No. 101984 of 2022
9. He would also contend that on the other hand
the compensation awarded on other heads is also on
higher side and the same needs to be reduced. The
compensation awarded on conventional heads amounting
to Rs.1,44,000/- is on higher side and same would have
been Rs.1,20,000/-.
10. Per contra, learned counsel for the
respondents/claimants would submit that the deceased
was working in JSW factory as labour and hence the
Tribunal has taken the income at Rs.13,250/- and the
Tribunal has awarded just and reasonable compensation.
11. In view of the rival contentions of the parties,
the following points would arise for consideration:
i. Whether the Tribunal has awarded exorbitant compensation as contended in the appeal?
ii. What order?
12. Regarding Point No.1: Having heard the
learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the
MFA No. 101984 of 2022
material on record, in support of the claim of the claimants
that the deceased was working in JSW factory as labour,
no documents are placed before the Court and in the
absence of any documentary proof, the Court has to
consider the notional income and has to make only the
guess work. In view of the chart prepared by the
Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, the notional
income at Rs.10,250/- should be taken into consideration.
Considering the age of the deceased, 40% is to be added
to the income of the deceased. Further, having considered
the number of dependants, 1/3rd of the income should be
deducted towards personal expenses of the deceased. The
multiplier adopted by the Tribunal is correct and needs no
interference. Thus, the claimants are entitled for the
following compensation under the head loss of
dependency.
Rs.10,250 + 40% = Rs.14,350/-
Rs.14,350 x 12 x 18 x 2/3rd = Rs.20,66,400/-
MFA No. 101984 of 2022
13. The claimants are also entitled for
Rs.1,20,000/- (Rs.40,000/- each) under the head loss of
consortium and love and affection since they are wife and
parents of the deceased. The Tribunal has awarded
Rs.33,000/- (Rs.16,500 each) under the heads loss of
estate and funeral expenses and the same is not interfered
with. Hence, in all the claimants are entitled for
Rs.22,19,400/- as against Rs.28,48,272/- with 6%
interest. Accordingly, point No.1 is answered.
14. Regarding point No.2: In view of the
discussions made above, I pass the following:
ORDER
Appeal is allowed in part.
In modification of the impugned judgment and award
passed by the Tribunal, the claimants are entitled for a
sum of Rs.22,19,400/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the
date of petition till realization as against Rs.28,48,272/-
MFA No. 101984 of 2022
awarded by the Tribunal in the impugned judgment and
award.
Apportionment and deposit of the compensation
amount would be as per the award of the Tribunal.
Amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be
transferred to the Tribunal forthwith.
Insurance Company is directed to deposit the
compensation amount within four weeks from the date of
receipt of a certified copy of this order.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!