Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11053 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
RSA NO 2384 OF 2007
BETWEEN
SMT CHENNAMMA
W/O BASALINGAPPA
SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS
I) ANAND S/O.VISHWANATH KALNOOR
AGE : 38 YEARS
R/O.MARTHUR, TQ. CHITTAPUR
DIST : KALABURAGI
II) SHIVARAJ S/O.CHITRASHEKAR PATIL
AGE : 36 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE
R/O.KANCHANAL, TQ. CHINCHOLI
DIST. KALABURAGI
... APPELLANTS
(By Smt NEEVA M CHIMKOD, ADV. )
AND :
1 . SHIVASHARANAPPA
S/O BASAVANNAPPA DANDAP GOL
MAJOR
R/AT RAJAPUR TALUK
GULBARGA DISTRICT 585 104
2
SIDDAMMA
SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS
2. MALLINATH
S/O BASAVANAPPA
MAJOR, TEACHER,
R/AT RAJAPURA TALUK
GULBARGA DISTRICT,
3 . CHANDRAKANTH
S/O BASAVANNAPPA
MAJOR,
BILL COLLECTOR
R/AT RAJAPURA TALUK
GULBARGA DISTRICT,
4 . REVENUE
S/O BASAVANNAPPA
MAJOR,
R/AT RAJAPURA TALUK
GULBARGA DISTRICT,
5 . SHIVANAND
S/O BASAVANNAPPA
MAJOR,
R/AT RAJAPURA TALUK
GULBARGA DISTRICT,
6 . SHIVASHARANAPPA
S/O BASAVANNAPPA
MAJOR,
R/AT RAJAPURA TALUK
GULBARGA DISTRICT,
3
7 . IRAMMA
W/O VISHWANATH
MAJOR,
R/AT RAJAPURA TALUK
GULBARGA DISTRICT,
8 . SMT SHARADA BAI
W/O CHITHRA SHEKAR
MAJOR,
R/AT RAJAPURA TALUK
GULBARGA DISTRICT,
9 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
GULBARGA DISTRICT,GULBARGA 585 103
.... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri SHIVANAND PATIL - ADV. FOR R1,R3, R4 & R6
VK FILED ONLY FOR R1;
SRI SANJAY KULKARNI - ADV. FOR R1, R3, R4 & R6;
GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R9;
V/O. DT 5.3.2009 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R2
IS HELD SUFFICIENT; R5, R7 & R8 - SERVED)
-------
RSA FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND
DECREE DTD 11.7.07 PASSED IN R.A.NO 138/06 ON THE FILE OF
THE I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE,SR.DN., GULBARGA ALLOWING THE
APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD
27.6.06 PASSED IN OS 599/90 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL.
CIVIL JUDGE, JR.DN., GULBARGA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
JUDGMENT
From the perusal of the order sheet it discloses that the
learned counsel for the appellants was absent continuously.
Today case was called out thrice. There is no representation for
the appellants. It seems that the appellants are not interested in
prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
rs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!