Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11041 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
R.P.No.392/2022
BETWEEN:
1 . K.M.ALIYULLA KHAN,
SINCE PRESUMED DEAD BY LRs
SMT. YASMIIN ALI KHAN
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
W/O KHURRAM AAZUDDIN,
D/O K.M.ALIYULLA KHAN,
R/O DOOR NO 3, 7TH CROSS
ABDUL RAHIMAN ROAD,
OPP. STONE PARK, UDAYAGIRI
MYSURU -570 019
2 . HIDAYATH ALI KHAN
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
S/O K.M.ALIYULLA KHAN,
R/O HURA ROAD, NANJANGUD TOWN
MYSORE DISTRICT- 571 301
3 . SADATH ALI KHAN
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
S/O K.M.ALIYULLA KHAN,
R/O HURA ROAD, NANJANGUD TOWN
MYSORE DISTRICT- 571 301
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI M.T.NANAIAH, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI.BALASUBRAMANYA, ADV.)
2
AND:
1. R.SARVESHA MURTHY
S/O.M.S.REVANNA MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
MAMBALLY VILLAGE & POST
NANJANGUD TALUK-571 301
2. M.S.REVANNA DEVARU
S/O.LATE SHIVA BASAVA DEVARU
SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
VISHALAKSHAMMANI
SINCE DEAD BY LRS R-2(a)
R-2(b) ALREADY ON RECORD
2(a) SHIVABASAVASWAMY
AGED 60 YEARS
2(b) R.CHIKKANNA SWAMY
AGED 52 YEARS
2(c) R.SUNDARESHA MURTHY
AGED 49 YEARS
2(d) R.SARVESHA MURTHY
AGED 48 YEARS
2(e) R.NAGARAJA MURTHY
AGED 43 YEARS
2(f) R.SHASHIDHAR KUMAR
AGED 41 YEARS
2(g) R.SUMITRA
AGED 47 YEARS
W/O.M.S.PALAK SHE MURTHY
2(h) ANNAPURNA
AGED 55 YEARS
W/O.B.N.PRABHAKARA SHARMA
3
2(i) MALLIKA
AGED 46 YEARS
2(j) MENAKA
AGED 44 YEARS
R2(a) TO 2(j) ARE CHILDREN OF
LATE RESPONDENT NO.2
AND ARE ALL RESIDENTS OF
MAMBALLY, YELANDUR TALUK
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-560 019
3. G.N.AZEESULLA
S/O.SABJAN SAB
SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
3(a) SAGIR AHMED
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O.AZEEZULLA
3(b) JAVED AHMED
SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
3(b) (a) MRS.MASUDA BEGUM
AGED 55 YEARS
3(b) (b) NOOR MOHD ALI
AGED 27 YEARS
S/O JAVED AHMED
R-3(a) TO 3(b)(c) ARE ALL RESIDENTS OF
CITIZEN ENGLISH SCHOOL BUILDING
KHB COLONY, NANJANGUD
MYSORE DISTRICT-571 301
... RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII
RULE 1 (1) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908,
PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE
COURT DATED: 28.01.2022 IN RSA NO.2476/2008 (DEC/INJ)
4
PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND RECALL THE SAME AND
RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL RECORD FOR
REHEARING AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner.
2. I find no grounds to review the judgment dated
28.01.2022 on the basis of in argument that the whereabouts
of the appellant were not known since 2014 and hence, a
presumption ought to have been drawn that he was dead and
his legal representatives ought to have been permitted to
prosecute the appeal. Review Petition is, therefore,
rejected.
SD/-
JUDGE
PKS CT:AN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!