Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10813 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2022
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3223/2015 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. VENKATESH
S/O SANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARAS,
R/O KADEMANUGANAHALLI VILLAGE,
(BEKKESHEDDU) HANAGODU HOBLI,
HUNSUR TALUK - 571 105.
2. SUBBAMMA,
W/O RAJU,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/O PANCHAVALLI VILLAGE,
PERIYAPATTNA TALUK - 571 107.
3. SHIVANNA
S/O LATE SANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/O MALAGANAKERE VILLAGE,
RAVANDUR HOBLI
PERIYAPATTANNA TALUK - 571 107.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. G.M. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR
SMT. KAVITHA H C, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THIMMAIAH DEAD BY LRS
-2-
1a. DEVAMMA,
W/O LATE KARIYAPPAA,
AGED ABOUWWT 67 YEARS,
R/AT MALAGANAKERE VILLAGE,
RAVANDUR HOLBI,
PERIYAPATNA TALUK,
PIN CODE - 571 107.
1b. KAMALAMMA,
W/O SANNAHYADA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/O CHIKKAMAGALAGOMALA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
PRIYAPATTNA TALUK,
PIN CODE - 571 107.
1c. THAYAMMA,
W/O PUTTAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/O AGRAHARA VILLAGE,
GAVADAGERE HOBLI,
HUNSUR TALUK,
PIN CODE - 571 105.
2. KARIYAPPA,
S/O THIMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
3. JAVARAPPA,
S/O THIMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
4. DEVAMMA,
D/O LATE KALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
5. SANNASWAMY
S/O LATE KALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
-3-
6. KARIYAIAH,
S/O LATE KALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
7. CHANDRA,
S/O LATE KALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
APPELLANT NO.2 TO 7 ARE
R/O MALAGANAKERE VILLAGE,
RAVANDUR HOLBI,
PRIYAPATTANA HOBLI,
PIN CODE - 571 107.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P D SUBRAMANYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 (a) to (c)
AND R3 TO R7;
R2 IS SERVED - UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED
UNDER ORDER 43, RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED10.12.2014 PASSED ON IA NO.3 IN
R.A.NO.363/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSORE, ALLOWING IA
NO.3 FILED U/O 39, RULE 1 & 2 OF CPC.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON
FOR FURTHER ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for
the appellants that the appeal is rendered infructuous
because the first appeal in RA No.363/2013 is disposed
of in the year 2016. The appeal must be dismissed
accordingly and it stands dismissed.
SD/-
JUDGE
SA Ct:sr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!