Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10230 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2022
-1-
MFA No. 102011 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT
M.F.A. NO.102011 OF 2022 (MC)
BETWEEN:
SRI CHETAN
S/O MALLAPPA GADDEPPANAVAR
AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE,
R/O. HULYAL, TQ. JAMKHANDI,
DIST. BAGALKOT.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN C. HUKKERI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT SHAILA
W/O CHETAN GADDEPPANAVAR
AGE. 27 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. C/O. MAHADEV VANDAL,
SHIROL CROSS, SHIROL,
TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT.
...RESPONDENT
Digitally
signed by
ROHAN
HADIMANI T
(BY SRI. PRASHANT KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE)
ROHAN
HADIMANI Location:
DHARWAD
T Date:
2022.07.11
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF THE
10:27:58
+0530 HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 09.02.2022, PASSED IN MATRIMONIAL CASE
NO.44/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE, JAMKHANDI, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER
SECTION 13(1)(b) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.
-2-
MFA No. 102011 of 2022
THIS MFA COMING FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, KRISHNA
S.DIXIT, J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.
JUDGMENT
Appellant-husband, in this appeal, seeks to lay a
challenge to the Judgment & Decree dated 09.02.2022
entered by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Jamkhandi, in
M.C. No.44/2018, whereby his prayer for grant of
dissolution of marriage between himself and the
respondent has been negatived. The respondent-wife has
entered appearance at the admission stage through her
counsel.
2. Both the appellant-husband and the
respondent-wife, who are present before the Court along
with their Advocates, have moved a compromise petition,
dated 04.07.2022, under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with
Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which
reads as under:
"i. It is submitted that appellant and respondent are agreed to dissolve their marriage solmenized on
MFA No. 102011 of 2022
08/02/2015 at Hulyal in Jamkhandi Taluka with free consent.
ii. The appellant and respondent have no issue out their wed-lock. The respondent herein has submitted no objection to allow the appeal and decree of divorce be granted.
iii. It is submitted that the respondent has agreed to receive an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- by D.D.No.066388 dated 4-7-2022 drawn on SBI branch High Court, Dharwad before this Hon'ble Court full and final settlement and also she agreed by accepting the above amount she will waive off her all legal rights against the appellant/husband for claiming any future maintenance, property right, service benefits and any other benefits from her husband side.
iv. It is submitted that, the respondent undertakes to withdraw the Criminal Petition bearing No.117/2019 pending on the file of Hon'ble J.M.F.C. Mudhol Court.
v. It is submitted that, after decree of divorce both appellant and respondent are free to marry their own choice and lead their happy life smoothly."
MFA No. 102011 of 2022
3. We have perused the compromise petition
carefully. We have interacted with the parties and the
father of the respondent as well. A perusal of the
compromise petition and interaction we had go to show
that the compromise is bona fide and that there is no legal
or factual impediment for disposal of this appeal in terms
thereof by reversing the impugned Judgment & Decree to
the net effect that the marriage between the parties be
dissolved.
4. The Account Payee Demand Draft dated
04.07.2022 for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten
Lakh), drawn on State Bank of India, High Court Branch,
Dharwad, is handed by the appellant to the respondent
who acknowledges receipt thereof. The Demand Draft is
drawn in the name of Shaila Vandal being the respondent's
maiden name, Shaila Chetan Geddappanavar being her
married name.
MFA No. 102011 of 2022
In the above circumstances, this appeal is disposed
off in terms of the compromise petition. The marriage
between the parties, solemnized on 08.02.2015 at Hulyal
village in Jamkhandi Taluk, is hereby dissolved.
It is undertaken by the respondent that she would
invest a sum of Rs.9,00,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakh) only in
a long term interest earning deposit in a Nationalised
Bank, and that she may be permitted to retain a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) only for her personal
expenses. Ordered accordingly.
Registry to draw the Decree accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
KMS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!