Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Lokesh S/O Lakshmayya vs Range Forest Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 375 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 375 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Sri Lokesh S/O Lakshmayya vs Range Forest Officer on 10 January, 2022
Bench: M.Nagaprasannapresided Bymnpj
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                      DHARWAD BENCH

           DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022

                            BEFORE

           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

              CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100042/2022

BETWEEN:

SRI LOKESH S/O LAKSHMAYYA
AGE. 45 YEARS,
R/O. SANKAPURA VILLAGE
GULURU POST
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572118
                                                 ...PETITIONER.

(BY SHRI MURTHY D. NAIK, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SHRI M.L.VANTI,
ADVOCATE.)


AND:

RANGE FOREST OFFICER
HIREKERUR-581111
HAVERI DISTRICT,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD-580001.
                                                 ...RESPONDENT.

(BY SHRI PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, HCGP.)


     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
FIR BEARING NO.HKR.FOC.CRIME 08/2021-22 DATED 13.08.2021,
REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 9
AND 51 OF THE WILD LIFE (PROTECTION) ACT, 1972, AT ANNEXURE-
A, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
                                          2




JMFC, AT HIREKERUR, AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4
HEREIN, ETC.,.

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

                                   ORDER

The learned Government Pleader accepts notice for the

respondent-State.

2. The petitioner calls in question the proceedings in

HKR FOC Crime No.8/2021-22, pending before the Senior Civil

Judge and JMFC, Hirekerur, registered for the offences

punishable under Sections 9 and 51 of the Wile Life (Protection)

Act, 1972.

3. Heard Shri Murthy D. Naik, the learned Senior

Counsel appearing for the learned counsel for petitioner Shri

M.L.Vanti and Shri Praveen K. Uppar, the learned Government

Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.

4. Both the learned counsel in unison would submit

that the issue in the lis with regard to maintainability of the

complaint for the aforesaid offences in the light of the offence

alleged coming under Schedule-V appended to the Wild Life

(Protection Act, 1972, stands covered by the judgment rendered

in Crl.P.No.101698/2021, disposed off on 30.11.2021, wherein

this Court has held as follows:

"8. Perused the material on record. The point that would arise for my consideration is:

Whether the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner under Sections 9 and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 is liable to be quashed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.?

My answer to the above point is in the 'Affirmative' for the following:

REASONS

9. It is the specific contention of the complainant that the accused has committed the offence under Section 9 punishable under Section 51 of the Act. Section 9 of the Act reads as under:

"9. Prohibition of hunting.- No person shall hunt any wild animal specified in Schedules I, II, II and IV except as provided under Section 11 and Section 12."

10. Admittedly, the Bat referred to in the complaint is not described in Schedule I, II, III or IV of the Act. But on the other hand, Schedule-V of the Act described 'fruit bats' at Sl.No.3. However, hunting of the animal specified under Schedule-V is not an offence under Section 9 of the Act. Under such circumstances, the penal provision under Section 51 of the Act is not attracted to the facts of the case. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner is liable to be quashed. Hence, I answer the above

point in the "Affirmative" and proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

The criminal petition is allowed.

The FIR No.HKR.FOC.Crime No.8/2021-22 of Karnataka Forest Department registered for the offences punishable under Sections 9 and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 against the petitioner herein is quashed."

5. In the light of the order passed by the co-ordinate

Bench of this Court concerning other accused in the same

complaint, I deem it appropriate to allow the petition and quash

the proceedings in HKR FOC Crime No.8/2021-22, pending

before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hirekerur, registered for

the offences punishable under Sections 9 and 51 of the Wile Life

(Protection) Act, 1972.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE Mrk/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter