Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 154 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRL.A. NO.100354 OF 2021
BETWEEN
CHANDRAKANT MANI NAIK
AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. TEACHER
R/O. BAVIKERI, TQ. ANKOLA
NOW AT KALATHER
TQ.KAPU, DIST. UDUPI
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.R H ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
(ANKOLA POLICE STATION, ANKOLA)
R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH,DHARWAD-580011
2 . GIRISH KUMAR K N
S/O K. NARAYAN
AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC.POLICE OFFICER
DIRECTOR OF CIVIL RIGHT ENFORCEMENT,
MUDA BUILDING URWA STORE
MANGALURU-575006
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.RAMESH B. CHIGARI, HCGP FOR R1)
(BY SRI.C.JAGADISH, SPL. COUNSEL FOR R2)
2
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 14 A(2) OF SC
AND ST (POA) ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND
SET ASIDE IMPUGNED ORDER ON BAIL APPLICATION FILED
U/S 438 OF CR.P.C., IN CRL.MISC.NO.367/2021, DATED
26.11.2021 BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, U.K. KARWAR AND CONSEQUENTLY
ENLARGE THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED ON BAIL IN
CONNECTION WITH ANKOLA P.S. CRIME NO.145/2021, FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 3(1)(q) OF SC/ST
(PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) AMENDMENT ACT 2015 AND
SECTIONS 198, 196, 420 OF IPC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for appellant and
learned Special Counsel appearing for respondent
No.2/complainant.
2. This appeal is filed under Section 14(A)(2)
of SC/ST Act, 1989 praying to set aside the order
dated 26.11.2021 passed by the II Addl. District
and Sessions Judge, Uttara Kannada, Karwar in
Crl. Misc. No.367/2021, whereby the petition filed
under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected.
3. The appellant herein is alleged to have
obtained a false caste certificate by giving false
information that he belong to Schedule Caste and
secured a job and thereby caused loss of
opportunity of a job to the persons belonging to
Schedule Caste and committed an offence
punishable under Section 3(i)(q) of
SC/ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015 and
offences punishable under Sections 198, 196 and
420 of IPC.
4. On the basis of a complaint lodged by the
official of Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement,
Mangaluru, a case was registered against the
appellant in Crime No.145/2021 of Ankola Police
Station for the afore-mentioned offences.
5. The learned Special Counsel appearing for
respondent No.2 would contend that the District
Caste Verification Committee after due verification
and enquiry has come to the conclusion that
appellant has obtained a false caste certificate by
giving false information claiming to be a member
of Schedule Caste and secured a job as a teacher
and thereby deprived other members of the
Schedule Caste from securing the said job. He has
contended that the Caste certificate fraudulently
obtained by the appelalnt has been cancelled. He
contends that there is a prima-facie case against
the appellant and therefore, the learned Sessions
Judge has rightly rejected the petition filed under
Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
6. It is the case of the prosecution that the
appellant obtained a false caste certificate from
the Tahasildar, Ankola taluk on 05.03.1993 by
furnishing false information, claiming to be a
member of Scheduled Caste which was
subsequently, annulled by the District Caste
Verification Committee vide order dated
23.11.2020.
7. The learned counsel for the appellant has
brought to the notice of the Court that the order
passed by the District Caste Verification
Committee canceling the caste certificate issued in
favour of appellant has been stayed in WP
No.148417/2020 vide order dated 22.12.2020. A
copy of the said order is enclosed. At this stage,
the question of obtaining the caste certificate by
giving false information as alleged is pending
consideration. Hence, it cannot be said that there
is a prima facie case made out against the
appellant so as to attract the ingredients of the
alleged offence and therefore, there is no
impediment to grant anticipatory bail to the
appellant. Hence, the following:
ORDER
Appeal is allowed.
The impugned order dated 26.11.2021 passed in
Crl.Misc.No.367/2021 on the file of the Court of II Addl.
District and Sessions Judge, Uttar Kannada, Karwar is
hereby set aside.
Appellant/accused is ordered to be released on bail
in the event of his arrest in Crime NO.145/2021 of Ankola
Police Station subject to following conditions:
i) The appellant shall appear before the
Investigating Officer within a period
of 10 days from the date of receipt
of a copy of this order.
ii) The appellant shall execute a
personal bond in a sum of
Rs.50,000/- with two sureties for like
sum to the satisfaction of the
Investigating Officer.
iii) The appellant shall furnish proof of
his residential address and shall
inform the Investigating Officer/
Court if there is any change in the
address.
iv) The appellant shall co-operate with
the investigation of the case.
vi) The appellant shall not tamper with
the prosecution witnesses either
directly or indirectly.
vii) The appellant shall be available for
the purpose of investigation
whenever necessary.
viii) The appellant shall regularly attend
the Court proceedings.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HMB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!