Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1003 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
MSA.NO.100134/2017
BETWEEN
SHRI.YALLARI S/O DHAKAPPA (DHAKO) KADAM
AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: GANGAWALI-591302,
TALUKA: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.VENKATESH M.KHARVI, ADV.)
AND
1. SMT.SARASWATI W/O APPANNA KADAM
AGE: 58 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE and HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: SINGARGAON-581186,
TALUKA: JOIDA,
DIST: KARWAR (U.K)
2. SHRI.RAJU S/O APPANNA KADAM
AGE: 32 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE and MASON,
R/O: SINGARGAON-581186,
TALUKA: JOIDA, DIST: KARWAR (U.K)
3. SMT.JANAKUBAI
W/O GANAPATI THOMBARE,
AGE: 63 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE and HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: RAMAGURWADI-591302,
TALUKA: KHANAPUR,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
2
4. SMT.LAXMI W/O SATERI KALYANI
AGE: 78 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE and HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: HEBBAL-591120,
TALUKA: KHANAPUR,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
5. SHRI.SHIVAJI S/O LAXMAN KADAM
AGE: 28 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: GANGAWALI-591302,
TALUKA: KHANAPUR,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
6. SHRI.DHAKAPPA (DHAKO) LAXMAN KADAM
AGE: 28 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: GANGAWALI-591302,
TALUKA: KHANAPUR,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
7. SMT.CHANDRABAI W/O LAXMAN KADAM
AGE: 58 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE and HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: GANGAWALI-591302,
TALUKA: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI.
... RESPONDENTS
(R3 TO R7 SERVED: R1 & R2 HELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER U/SEC.43 RULE 1(u) READ WITH
SECTION 104 OF CPC., 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND
DECREE DTD:19.08.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.32/2014 ON THE FILE
OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST
CLASS, KHANAPUR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD:25.02.2014 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.138/2009, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE
AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, KHANAPUR, DISMISSING
THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF OF
PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
present Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed questioning
the remand order. However, after remand, he has
instructions that suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
His submission is taken on record.
The Miscellaneous Second Appeal is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE MBS/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!