Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3389 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2022
M.F.A No.1879/2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
M.F.A No.1879 OF 2019 (MV)
BETWEEN :
THE MANAGER (LEGAL)
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
OPP. KSRTC BUS STAND
1ST FLOOR, NO.36D, MYSORE TRADE CENTRE
MYSORE-570 001
NOW REP. BY ITS
LEGALMANAGER
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR
CENTENARY BUILDING
NO.28, M.G.ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001 ... APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE)
AND :
1. SMT. POORNIMA K
W/O LATE NANDAKUMAR T
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
2. PRATHIKA N
S/O LATE NANDAKUMAR T
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
M.F.A No.1879/2019
2
3. POOJA N
D/O LATE NANDAKUMAR T
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
4. T. THIMMEGOWDA
S/O LATE HONNITHIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
5. SMT. PUTTAMMA
W/O T. THIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT GOSEGOWDA STREET
SRIRANGAPATNA TOWN
MANDYA DISTRICT-580 726
6. M/S. D.K. CONSTRUCTION
NO.922, 1ST MAIN
KANTHARAJE URS ROAD
LAKSHMIPURAM
MYSORE-570 725 ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI. R. PRAMOD, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5;
SHRI. N. DILEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 29.09.2018 PASSED IN MVC
NO.1409/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, &
MEMBER, MACT, SRIRANGAPATNA, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF
RS.16,49,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 9% P.A FROM THE DATE OF
PETITION TILL REALIZATION.
THIS MFA, HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
JUDGMENT ON 19.01.2022 COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF
JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J, PRONOUNCED THE
FOLLOWING:-
M.F.A No.1879/2019
3
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by Reliance General Insurance
Company challenging the judgment and Award dated
September 29, 2018 in MVC No.1409/2016 on the file of
Prl. Senior Civil Judge and Member, MACT, Srirangapatna.
2. Heard Shri. B. Pradeep learned Advocate for
appellant, Shri. R. Pramod learned Advocate for first to fifth
respondents and Shri. N. Dileep, learned Advocate for sixth
respondent.
3. For the sake of convenience, parties shall be
referred as per their status before the Tribunal.
4. Shri. Pradeep, for the insurer urged two grounds.
Firstly that the driver of the offending vehicle did not
possess a valid driving license. Therefore, the insurer is not
liable to indemnify the owner of the offending vehicle as
there has been breach of policy condition. Secondly that M.F.A No.1879/2019
rate of interest at 9% awarded by the Tribunal is higher.
Accordingly, he prayed for allowing this appeal.
5. Shri. Pramod and Shri. Dileep, for respondents
argued opposing the appeal.
6. We have carefully considered rival contentions
and perused the records.
7. Undisputed facts of the case are, first claimant's
husband Nanda Kumar was working in a Stone Crushing
Unit run in the name and style of 'Sumathi Stone Crusher'
situated in Ragimuddanahalli, Mandya Taluk. A lorry of
Eicher make with a tanker loaded with diesel came to the
site to deliver the diesel. After delivering the diesel, the
driver moved the vehicle in reverse direction. Nanda Kumar
who was standing behind the lorry sustained grievous
injuries and died in the hospital. On consideration of the
claim petition, Tribunal has awarded `16,49,000/- and
directed the insurer to satisfy the Award. Feeling aggrieved,
the insurer has presented this appeal.
M.F.A No.1879/2019
8. The main contention urged by Shri. Pradeep for
the insurer is, the driver of a tanker carrying diesel is
required to possess specific endorsement to drive the
hazardous goods vehicle and admittedly, the driver did not
possess a valid licence to drive the tanker. Therefore,
insurer is not liable to indemnify the owner.
9. He further submitted that Tribunal has awarded
interest at 9% p.a. This Court has been consistently
granting interest at 6% p.a. Accordingly, he prayed for
allowing this appeal.
10. Shri. Dileep for the owner of the offending
vehicle, placing reliance on New India Assurance Company
Ltd., Vs. Shri. Velumurugan and another1 submitted that
the accident has occurred after diesel was unloaded while
the driver was reversing the truck. Therefore, as held by
this Court in Velumurugan, no special license was required
because, the vehicle was not loaded with any dangerous or
hazardous goods when the accident took place.
ILR 2015 KAR 393 M.F.A No.1879/2019
11. This argument is untenable because, admittedly,
the tanker loaded with diesel came to the Stone crushing
site driven by a driver who did not possess a valid licence.
The learned Advocate sought to make a very fine distinction
that when the tanker dashed against the victim, diesel was
unloaded.
12. Thus, in substance, the argument advanced on
behalf of the owner of the vehicle is, though the driver did
not possess license to drive a vehicle carrying hazardous
material, the diesel was unloaded at the time of accident.
Therefore, he is entitled for benefit flowing from the
judgment of this Court in Velumurugan.
13. It is important to note that Motor Vehicle Act and
Rules have prescribed special attributes for a person
desirous of driving vehicles carrying dangerous or
hazardous material. Section 14 of MV Act reads as follows:
"14. Currency of licences to drive motor vehicles.--(1) A learner's licence issued under this Act shall, subject to the other provisions of this Act, be effective M.F.A No.1879/2019
for a period of six months from the date of issue of the licence.
(2) A driving licence issued or renewed under this Act shall,--
(a) in the case of a licence to drive a transport vehicle, be effective for a period of three years: [Provided that in the case of licence to drive a transport vehicle carrying goods of dangerous or hazardous nature be effective for a period of one year and renewal thereof shall be subject to the condition that the driver undergoes one day refresher course of the prescribed syllabus; and;
(b) in the case of any other licence,--
(i) if the person obtaining the licence, either originally or on renewal thereof, has not attained the age of fifty years on the date of issue or, as the case may be, renewal thereof,--
(A) be effective for a period of twenty years from the date of such issue or renewal;or (B) until the date on which such person attains the age of fifty years, whichever is earlier;
(ii) if the person referred to in sub-clause (i), has attained the age of fifty years on the date of issue or as the case may be. renewal thereof, be effective, on payment of such fee as may be prescribed, for a period of five years from the date of such issue or renewal:
Provided that every driving licence shall, notwithstanding its expiry under this sub-section, continue to be effective for a period of thirty days from such expiry.
M.F.A No.1879/2019
Rule 9 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules made as follows:
9. Educational qualifications for drivers of goods carriages carrying dangerous or hazardous goods.--(1) One year from the date of commencement of Central Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Rules, 1993, any person driving a goods carriage carrying goods of dangerous or hazardous nature to human life share, in addition to being the holder of a driving licence to drive a transport vehicle, also have the ability to read and write at least one Indian language out of those specified in the VIII Schedule of the Constitution and English and also possess a certificate of having successfully), passed a course consisting of following syllabus and periodicity connected with the transport of such goods.
Period of training 3 days
Place of training At any institute recognised by the
State Government
Syllabus
A. Defencive driving
Questionnaire Duration of training
Cause of accidents for A & B--1st and Accidents statistics 2nd day Driver's personal fitness Car condition Braking distance Highway driving Road / Pedestrian crossing Railway crossing Adapting to weather Head on collision Rear end collision Night driving Films and discussion M.F.A No.1879/2019
B. Advance Driving skills and Training
(i) Discussion Before starting - Check list
- Outside/below/near/ Vehicle
-Product side
- Inside vehicle During driving - Correct speed/gear
- Signalling
- Lane control
-Overtaking/giving side
-Speed limit/safe distance
- Driving on slopes Before stopping - Safe stopping place signalling, road width, condition After stopping - preventing vehicle movement
- wheel clocks
- vehicle attendance Night driving
(ii) field test - 1 driver at a time testing C. Product safety - UN classification duration UN Panel - Hazchem Code of training
- Toxicity, for (C) Flammability third day other definitions Product information - Tremcards
- CIS/MSDS
- Importance of temperature pressure, level
- Explosive limits
- Knowledge about equipment Emergency procedure - Communication
- Spillage handling
- Use of PPE
- Fire fighting
- First Aid
- Toxic release control
- Protection of wells, rivers, lakes, etc.
- Use of protective equipment
- Knowledge about valves, etc.
(2) The holder of a driving licence possessing the minimum educational qualification or the certificate referred to in sub- rule (1), shall make an application in writing on a plain M.F.A No.1879/2019
paper along with his driving licence and the relevant certificate to the licensing authority in whose jurisdiction he resides for making necessary entries in his driving licence and if the driving licence is in Form 7 the application shall be accompanied by the fee as is referred to in Serial No. 8 of the Table to rule 32.
(3) The licensing authority, on receipt of the application referred to in sub-rule (2), shall make an endorsement in the driving licence of the applicant to the effect that he is authorised to drive a goods carriage carrying goods of dangerous or hazardous nature to human life.
(4) A licensing authority other than the original licensing authority making any such endorsement shall communicate the fact to the original licensing authority."
14. Thus, a person desirous of driving a vehicle
carrying hazardous material is required to pass a course
with the syllabus provided in the Rules.
15. On facts, it is not disputed that the driver of the
offending vehicle had driven the tanker loaded with diesel
and the same was unloaded in the stone crushing unit. If
the argument advanced on behalf of the owner to shift the
liability on the Insurer were to be accepted, in our view, it
amounts to placing premium on the impunity on the part of
the driver.
M.F.A No.1879/2019
16. In Velu Murugan, on facts, this Court has held
that the tanker was returning after unloading, whereas, in
the case on hand, the tanker was at the site itself. This is a
classic difference on facts.
17. In view of the admitted fact that the driver did
not possess the license to drive a vehicle carrying
hazardous substance and the accident having taken place at
the site where diesel was unloaded, the contention urged on
behalf of the owner of the vehicle does not merit
consideration.
18. So far as the rate of interest is concerned,
Shri. Pradeep is right in his contention that this Court has
been consistently granting interest at the rate of 6% p.a.
Shri. R. Pramod, learned Advocate for the claimant has no
objection to modify the rate of interest.
19. In view of the above, following:
ORDER
(a) Appeal is allowed in part.
M.F.A No.1879/2019
(b) The judgment and award passed by the Tribunal
is modified holding that the claimant shall be entitled for a
sum of Rs.16,49,000/- with 6% interest per annum from
the date of petition till the date of deposit.
(c) The insurer is held liable to satisfy the Award by
depositing the compensation amount within eight weeks
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order with liberty
to recover the same from the Owner of the offending
vehicle (respondent No. 6) by executing the decree in these
proceedings.
(d) Registry shall transmit the amount in deposit to
the Tribunal, for disbursement as per its directions.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SPS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!