Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3317 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
R.F.A. NO.121 OF 2022 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI S N BASAVACHARI
S/O LATE S.V. NANJUNDACHARI
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/AT SRI. VENKATESHWARA JEWELERS
BUS STAND, VEMGAL, KOLAR TALUK
KOLAR 563 102 ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI.RAMAKRISHNA HEGDE, ADV.)
AND:
1. SRI V KESHAVA
S/O LATE VEERABHADRAPPA V.M
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, POST MASTER
NEAR BUS STOP, VEMGAL
VEMGAL VILLAGE
KOLAR TALUK 563 102
2. SMT. PARVATHAMMA
W/O LATE V.M. VEERABHADRAPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, NEAR BUS STOP
VEMGAL, VEMGAL VILLAGE
KOLAR TALUK 563 102
3. SRI. V SHIVARAJ
S/O LATE VEERABHADRAPPA V M
2
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
BEHIND ARYAN SCHOOL
NEAR BUS STOP, VEMGAL
VEMAGAL VILLAGE
KOLAR TALUK 563 102
4. SMT. V. SHIVAMMA
D/O LATE VEERABHADRAPA V M
W/O LATE M. CHANDRASHEKHAR
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
WORKING IN KEB OFFICE
VIJAYAPURA, R/AT KEB QUARTERS
CHIKKABALLAPUR ROAD
VIJAYAPURA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 560110
5. SRI.V. SHIVAKUMAR
S/O ATE VEERABHADRAPPA V.M
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NEAR BUS STOP
VEMGAL, VEMAGAL VILLAGE
KOLAR TALUK 563 102
6. SMT. V.S. GEETANJALI
D/O V. SHIVARAJ
W/O PRAKASH R
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT MARUTHI
BADAVANE, MALURU TOWN 563 130
7. SMT. V.S. SANGEETHA
D/O V.SHIVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
BEHIND ARYAN SCHOOL
NEAR BUS STOP
VEMGAL, VEMAGAL VILLAGE
KOLAR TALUK 563 102 ... RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST
3
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.11.2021 PASSED
IN OS.NO.180/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C I
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AND CJM., KOLAR,
PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION, SEPARATE
POSSESION AND MESNE PROFIT.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The appellant has filed a memo dated 25.02.2022.
It is stated that the suit of the plaintiff is decreed with cost
and it has held that he is entitled to 1/5th share in the suit
property. The same is challenged in the instant appeal.
The value of the subject matter of the appeal is stated to
be Rs.2,70,000/-. Hence, it is prayed that the appellant be
permitted to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to file
regular appeal before the District Court.
2. As it is stated that the value of the subject
matter of the appeal is Rs.2,70,000/-, appellant is
permitted to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to file
regular appeal before the jurisdictional District Court.
3. Office is directed to verify and return the Court
fee, if the appellant is so entitled along with the documents
filed after obtaining the photocopies of the same. The
appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MH/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!