Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3159 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5158 OF 2011 (MV)
BETWEEN:
IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
NO.41, II FLOOR,
CRISTU COMPLEX,
LAVELLE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
BY IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
SRI SHANTHI TOWERS,
5TH FLOOR, 3RD MAIN,
NO.141, EAST OF NGEF LAYOUT,
NEAR TIN FACTORY,
KASTURINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 084,
BY ITS MANAGER.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI O. MAHESH, ADV.)
AND:
1. S. RAMESH
S/O. SRINIVAS,
AGED 21 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.1019,
GEETHANJALI LAYOUT,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
OPP: BEML,
BENGALURU-560 075.
2
2. TANSNEEM BANU
MAJOR,
W/O. SHAHUAHAM,
NO.604, KGN ENTERPRISES,
8TH CROSS, A.C. COLLEGE POST,
KUSHALANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 116.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY: NOTICE TO R-1 IS HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER
DATED 6-9-2016 AND NOTICE TO R-2 IS DISPENSED
WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 11-3-2016)
***
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 9-2-2011 PASSED IN M.V.C.
NO.1427 OF 2009 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, MACT,
BENGALURU, AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF RS.1,41,312/-
WITH INTEREST @ 8% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL DEPOSIT, EXCEPT ON FUTURE MEDICAL EXPENSES.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is at the instance of the Insurance
Company calling in question the correctness of the
judgment and award dated 9-2-2011 in M.V.C. No.1427 of
2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
Bengaluru.
2. I have heard Sri O. Mahesh, learned counsel for
the appellant-Insurance Company. The respondents have
remained unrepresented.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance
Company submits that the offending vehicle, i.e. auto-
rickshaw, did not have a valid permit to ply as on the date
of the accident and therefore, following the decisions of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in AMRIT PAUL SINGH AND
ANOTHER v. TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS1 and in RANI AND
OTHERS v. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
AND OTHERS2, the proper order to be passed is for the
Tribunal to issue directions to the insurer to pay the
award amount in the first instance and thereafter, recover
from the owner-insured in the same proceedings.
1 AIR 2018 SC 2662 2 (2018) 8 SCC 492
4. The Tribunal has noticed at paragraph No.21 of
the impugned judgment and award that auto-rickshaw
was holding valid permit from 18-7-2001 to 17-7-2006 as
per Ex.R.2. Accident took place on 5-12-2008. Therefore,
there is violation of policy condition by the insured in as
much as he plied the insured auto-rickshaw without
proper permit as on the date of the accident. In that view
of the matter, as per the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the cases of AMRIT PAUL SINGH and RANI
supra, the appellant-Insurance Company is only liable to
pay the award amount with interest thereon in the first
instance and thereafter, entitled to recover the same from
the owner-insured of the offending vehicle in the same
proceedings. Accordingly, I pass the following
ORDER
i. Appeal is partly allowed by modifying the
direction in the award to the effect that the
appellant-Insurance Company shall in the first
instance pay the award amount with interest
thereon and recover the same from the owner-
insured in the same proceedings, and
ii. Amount in deposit shall be transmitted to the
Tribunal along with its records, forthwith.
Sd/-
JUDGE
kvk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!