Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3154 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL
W.A. No.2575 OF 2019 (T-IT)
IN
W.P.No.57865 OF 2015 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PRIVATE LIMITED
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
PLOT NO.1, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA
RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562 109
NOW REPRESENTED HEREIN BY
VINAY BHAGAWAN
DEPUTY MANAGER
LEGAL AND SECRETARIAL DIVISION.
... APPELLANT
(BY MR. S.S. NAGANAND, SR. COUNSEL FOR
MRS. SUMANA NAGANANDA, ADV.,)
AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2
2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX
KARNATAKA AND GOA REGION
CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING
NO.1, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001.
3. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT (LTU)
CIRCLE-I, JSS TOWERS
100 FEET RING ROAD
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE
BANGALORE-560 085.
4. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT (LTU)
CIRCLE-I, JSS TOWERS
100 FEET RING ROAD
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE
BANGALORE-560 085.
5. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT (LTU)
CIRCLE-I, JSS TOWERS
100 FEET RING ROAD
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE
BANGALORE-560085.
6. JOINT DIRECTOR (TRANSFER PRICING-II)
3RD FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BANGALORE-560 095.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV., FOR R1 TO R6)
---
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
11/06/2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP
NO.57865/2015 [T-IT] AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION.
3
THIS W.A. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This intra court appeal has been filed against the
order dated 11.06.2019 passed by learned Single Judge
by which writ petition preferred by the petitioner has
been disposed of.
2. The learned Single Judge by the aforesaid order
has upheld the validity of Section 271(1)(c) of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the
Act' for short) and issued a direction to the appellate
authority to decide the appeal preferred by the
petitioner against the order dated 22.09.2015 by which
penalty was levied on the petitioner. The appeal
preferred by the petitioner was dismissed by the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) by an order
dated 11.12.2019. Against the aforesaid order, the
petitioner preferred an appeal before the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the
tribunal' for short). The tribunal by an order dated
03.11.2020 has allowed the appeal preferred by the
petitioner. Therefore, on account of the subsequent
event, which has taken place during the pendency of
this appeal, the grievance of the petitioner stands
redressed. However, the issue with regard to validity of
Section 271(1)(c) of the Act is kept open, which may be
agitated in an appropriate forum.
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!