Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt.Shantabai W/O Vitthal ... vs Shri.Sunil S/O Vasant Mane
2022 Latest Caselaw 2962 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2962 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Smt.Shantabai W/O Vitthal ... vs Shri.Sunil S/O Vasant Mane on 22 February, 2022
Bench: S G Pandit, Anant Ramanath Hegde
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                       DHARWAD BENCH

           DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022

                            PRESENT

              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
                             AND
        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

                  M.F.A. No. 103418/2019 (MV)
BETWEEN:

1.     SMT. SHANTABAI W/O VITTHAL DHANAGAR @ HERAWADE,
       AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O NEJ,
       TQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 307.

2.    SHRI. VITTHAL S/O APPAJI DHANAGAR @ HERAWADE,
      AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O NEJ,
      TQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 307.
                                            -     APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SANTOSH S. HATTIKATAGI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     SHRI. SUNIL S/O VASANT MANE,
       AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O CHANDUR,
       TAL: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 307.

2.   THE MANAGER,
     ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE
     COM. LTD., NEHRU NAGAR, BELAGAVI-593 107.
                                          -      RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.N. RAICHUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2,
NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH)

      THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
173(1) OF M.V. ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
30.04.2019 PASSED IN M.V.C.NO. 477/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE
LEARNED VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND ADDL.
MACT, BELAGAVI SITTING AT CHIKODI & ETC.
                                    2



     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON                    FOR
ADMISSION THIS DAY, S.G. PANDIT J., DELIVERED                     THE
FOLLOWING:
                           JUDGEMENT

Though the appeal is listed for admission, with the consent

of parties, the appeal is taken up for final disposal.

2. The parents of Manjunath Vitthal Dhanagar (deceased) are

in appeal not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation

awarded under the judgment and award dated 30.04.2019

passed in M.V.C. No. 477/2018 by the learned VII Addl. Dist. &

Sessions Judge & AMACT, Belagavi, sitting at Chikodi (for short

'Tribunal') and praying for enhancement of compensation.

3. We have heard Sri Santosh S. Hattikatagi, learned counsel

for the appellant and Sri G.N. Raichur, learned counsel for

respondent No.2 and perused the appeal papers.

4. The accident which had taken place on 20.12.2017

involving motorcycle bearing Reg. No. KA-23/EJ-8879 and TATA

ACE vehicle bearing No. KA-23/B-0101 and the resultant death

of the victim-Manjunath is not in dispute in this appeal. The

claimants are before this Court seeking enhancement of

compensation. The respondent-insurance company has not filed

any appeal questioning the liability. Hence, the only question

which falls for consideration is as to whether the appellants

would be entitled for enhancement of compensation.

5. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the

deceased was a coolie and the income assessed by the Tribunal

at `9,000/- per month is on the lower side when compared to

the notional income that would be determined by this Court and

the Lok Adalath while settling the accidental claims of the year

2017. Since the accident is of the year 2017 he prays for

assessing the income of the deceased at `10,250/- per month.

Further, the learned counsel submits that the deceased was 21

years and would be entitled for 40% of the assessed income

towards future prospects. It is also the submission of the

learned counsel for the appellant that parents of the deceased

would be entitled for `40,000/- each on the head of Filial

Consortium as held by the Hon'ble Apex court in Magma

General Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Nanu Ram and others (2018

ACJ 2781). Thus, prays for allowing the appeal and to enhance

the compensation.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2-insurance

company submits that the quantum of compensation awarded by

the Tribunal is just compensation which needs no interference.

Thus, he prays for dismissal of the appeal.

7. The income assessed by the Tribunal at `9,000/- per

month of the deceased is on the lower side. It is their claim that

the deceased was doing coolie work but no material or document

is placed to establish the income of the deceased. In the

absence of any material or document to establish the income,

this Court and the Lok Adalath would normally assess the

notional income at `10,250/- per month while settling the

accidental claims of the year 2017 based on the chart prepared

by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority by taking note

of the various factors including minimum wage. Thus, we would

assess the notional income of the deceased at `10,250/- per

month.

8. The deceased was aged 21 years. As held by the Hon'ble

Apex Court in National Insurance Company Limited v.

Pranay Sethi and others (AIR 2017 SC 5157) wherever the

deceased was aged less than 40 years, the claimants would be

entitled for adding 40% of the assessed income towards future

prospects. In the instant case, since deceased was aged 21

years, the claimants would be entitled for adding 40% of the

assessed income towards future prospects. The claimants are

parents. They have lost the love and affection of the son and

they would be entitled for filial consortium at the rate of

`40,000/- each as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

Magma Insurance (supra).

9. The Tribunal has awarded interest at the rate of 9% p.a.

on the compensation. In the circumstances of the case and in

view of the present day bank interest rate we deem it

appropriate to award interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the

date of petition till realization on the enhanced compensation.

10. For the reasons stated above, the claimants are entitled

for compensation as under:

  Sl.      Particulars                                        Amount (`)
  No.
  1.       Loss of dependency                                 15,49,800.00
           10,250/- + 40% less 50% towards
           personal expenses `7,175x 12 x18
  2.       Filial consortium (`40,000/- x 2)                        80,000.00
  3.       Transportation of dead body and funeral                  30,000.00
           expenses
           Total                                              16,59,800.00

For the foregoing reasons we pass the following order.

ORDER

The appeal filed by the claimants is allowed in part. The

claimants are entitled for a total compensation of `16,59,800/-

as against `10,02,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. The claimants

are entitled for interest at 6% p.a. on the enhanced

compensation amount from the date of petition till payment.

The judgement and award passed by the by the learned VII

Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge & AMACT, Belagavi, sitting at

Chikodi dated 30.04.2019 in M.V.C. No. 477/2018 is modified

accordingly.

The respondent no.2-insurer shall deposit the entire

compensation with interest within six weeks from the date of

preparation of the award.

Registry to transmit the trial Court records forthwith.

SD JUDGE

SD JUDGE bvv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter