Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2926 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2015
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B.
CRL.A NO 391 OF 2014
BETWEEN
SRI LAKSHMANMURTHY R
S/O G RAMAIAH
ADVOCATE
R/AT NO.13, 'CHIRAG NILAYA'
8TH CROSS, ADITHYANAGAR LAYOUT
VIDYARANYAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560097
... APPELLANT
(By Sri : VIJAYA KUMAR C-ADV.)
AND
SRI UMASHANKAR M
S/O LAWTE MUNIBYRAPPA
MAJOR
NO.85, PATTANAGERE
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR
BANGALORE-560098
... RESPONDENT
CRL.A. FILED U/S. 411 R/W SEC.397 CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED:6.1.14 IN
CRL.A.NO.418/13 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL.CITY CIVIL
AND S.J., BANGALORE CITY AND THAT OF JUDGMENT AND
ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED:27.7.13 IN
2
C.C.NO.20323/10 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDL.C.M.M.,
BANGALORE CITY BE RESTORED, AND THIS PETITION BE
ALLOWED IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Appellant and learned counsel appearing for the
appellant, both are absent. No representation. Office
objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
Psg*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!