Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2909 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
WRIT APPEAL No.100028 OF 2020 (S-R)
BETWEEN:
1. THE HUBLI DHARAWD MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
HUBBALLI-20.
2. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER,
PENSION CELL, HUBBALLI DHARWAD
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, HUBBALLI-20,
DISTRICT:DHARWAD-580020.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
ZONAL OFFICE NO.8, THE HUBBALLI
DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
DHARWAD-580020.
4. THE HEALTH OFFICER
HUBBALLI DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
HUBBALLI-20, TQ & DIST:DHARWAD-580020.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SMT. GANGAWWA W/O DURGAPPA
VAGARNAL, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
OCC:RETIRED, RESIDENT OF KARAKIBASAVESHWARA
2
NAGAR, HUBBALLI-20, TQ & DIST:DHARWAD-580020.
2. SHRI. YALLABURGEPPA S/O RAMAPPA
GOBBARDAVAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
OCC:RETIRED, RESIDING AT NO.45,
KARAKIBASAVESHWARA NAGAR,
4TH CROSS, NEAR DURGADEVI TEMPLE,
HUBBALLI-20, TQ & DIST:DHARWAD-580025.
3. SRI. KARIYAPPA S/O HANMANTHAPPA
NAIKAL, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC:RETIRED,
RESIDING AT D.NO.14TH MAIN ROAD,
KARAKIBASAVESHWARA NAGAR,
NEAR DURGADEVI TEMPLE,
HUBBALLI-20, TQ & DIST:DHARWAD-580025.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 17.9.2019 MADE IN WRIT PETITION
NO.102339-2341/2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, S.G. PANDIT J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGEMENT
This intra-court appeal is filed by Hubballi-Dharwad
Municipal Corporation (for short, 'Corporation') assailing
the legality and correctness of the order dated 17.9.2019
in WP Nos.102339-2341/2018, wherein the learned Single
Judge directed the appellant/Corporation to refund the
recovered amount with 6% interest within a period of
three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of
the order. Further, learned Single Judge directed at para-
10 of the impugned order as follows:
Further, the difference in amount with respect to the entitlement to the petitioners of the time bound scale from the date of withdrawal of this benefit is to be made good by the respondent-Corporation. Accordingly, petitions are disposed off subject to the above observations.
2. Sri. G.I. Gachchinamath, learned counsel for
the appellants-Corporation vehemently argued contending
that the learned Single Judge was not right in directing the
refund of recovered amount and also directing to make
good of difference amount of time bound scale to the
respondents/petitioners.
3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the
question involved in this appeal was the subject matter in
WA No.100031/2020 and connected matters. The co-
ordinate Bench of this Court by its judgement dated
11.8.2021 dismissed the appeal as devoid of merit
confirming the order of the learned Single Judge. In view
of decision of co-ordinate Bench of this Court, wherein
similar issue is answered, the present appeal is disposed of
in terms of judgment dated 11.8.2021 in WA
No.100031/2020 and connected matters. Accordingly, writ
appeal stands dismissed confirming the impugned order of
the learned Single Judge.
4. Pending applications, if any, do not survive for
consideration and accordingly, they are disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
JTR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!