Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2671 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
RSA.NO.5619/2012 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN
1. MAHADEVAPPA S/O PUTTAPPA HARIHAR
AGE: 76 YRS, OCC: AGRIL.,
R/O RANEBENNUR, TQ: RANEBENNUR,
DIST: HAVERI
2. PANDURANGAPPA S/O PUTTAPPA HARIHAR,
AGE: 63 YRS, OCC: RETIRED,
R/O RANEBENNUR-581115,TQ: RANEBENNUR,
DIST: HAVERI
3. SAKKUBAI W/O SANKAPPA CHURI
AGE: 55 YRS, OCC: HOUSEHOLDWORK,
R/O KANNYALAGASAI ONI, BETAGERI
TQ: and DIST: GADAG
4. SARASWATIBAI W/O NAGAPPA KUDARI
AGE: 51 YRS, OCC: HOUSEHOLDWORK,
R/O SANTE SHIGLI-582120,TQ: SHIRAHATTI,
DIST: GADAG.
5. RADHAWWA W/O SHIVARUDRAPPA KUDARI
AGE: 49 YRS, OCC: HOUSEHOLDWORK,
R/O NEKAR COLONY, OPP: TILES FACTORY,
RANEBENNUR-581115
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.PRAKASH ANGADI, ADV. (ABSENT)
APPELALNT NO.2 (ABSENT))
2
AND
1. PANDAPPA BASAPPA HARIHAR
AGE: 61 YRS, OCC: RETIRED,
R/O BEERADEVAR ONI, RANEBENNUR581115, TQ:
RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI
2. KARIYAPPA BASAPPA HARIHAR,
DECEASED BY HIS LR
A) CHANNAWWA W/O KARIYAPPA HARIHAR,AGE: 48 YRS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O BEERADEVAR ONI,
RANEBENNUR581115, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI
3. VEERANNA BASAPPA HARIHAR
AGE: 50 YARS, OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE,
NEAR BEERADEVAR TEMPLE ROAD, KURABAGERI,
RANEBENNUR-581115TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI
4. BASAVARAJ BASAPPA HARIHAR
AGE: 43 YARS, OCC: COOLIE,
NEAR BEERADEVAR TEMPLE ROAD, KURABAGERI,
RANEBENNUR-581115TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI
... RESPONDENTS
(APPEAL AGAINST R1 DISMISSED AS ABATED)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC SEEKING
TO SET ASIDE THE COMMON JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
02.01.2012 IN R.A.NO.27/2008 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RENEBENNUR CONFIRMING THE
COMMON JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.01.2008 IN
O.S.NO.1/2000 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL
JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND II ADDITIONAL JMFC, RANEBENNUR AND
DISMISS O.S.NO.1/2000.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the appellants.
Perused the order sheet. On 08.02.2022, the learned
counsel for appellant No.2 has retired from the case.
Today also, when the matter is called, there is no
representation for the appellants. No arrangements have
been made to engage some other counsel. It appears that
appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE MBS/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!