Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2468 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
R.F.A. NO.904 OF 2006 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
SRI B C NARYANAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNISWAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
R/AT NO 142, 4TH CROSS
NAGAPPA BLOCK
SRIRAMPURAM
BANGALORE-560 021
SINCE DEAD BY LRs
1. SRI.N.SURESH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O LATE B.C.NARAYANANAPPA
2. SRI. N. SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA
3. SMT. N. SAVITHRAMMA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
W/O NARAYANASWAMY
4. SMT. N. RUKMINI
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
W/O MUNIRAJU
2
5. SMT. N. HEMAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
W/O MUNIYAPPA
6. SMT. N. LEELAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
W/O ANANDA REDDY
7. SMT. SHARADAMMA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
W/O LATE B.C.NARAYANAPPA
ALL ARE R/AT C/O
AT NO.142, 4TH CROSS
NAGAPPA BLOCK, SRIRAMPURA
BANGALORE - 560 021
(AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT
AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 09.02.2009)
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.M.S.NARAYANA RAO, ADV. [ABSENT])
AND:
1. SMT JYOTSNABEN MANOHARDAS VALIA VIDE COURT ORDER
W/O MANORDAS VALIA DATED 20.09.2010
R/AT NO 46, 4TH CROSS APPEAL STANDS
DISMISSED
GANDHI NAGAR
AGAINST R-1
BANGALORE-560 009
2. SRI C MANI
R/AT NO 116,
4TH CROSS, SAIBABA NAGAR
SRIRAMPURAM BANGALORE-21
3
3. SRI RAJENDRA
R/AT NO 68, 1ST CROSS
ROBERTSON BLOCK
SRIRAMPURAM
BANGALORE-560 021
4. SRI YETHIRAJ
R/AT NO 144, NEW NO.37
4TH CROSS NAGAPPA BLOCK
SRIRAMPURAM BANGALORE-560 021
5. SRI CHAKRAPANI
R/AT NO 36, 5TH CROSS
L N PURAM, SRIRAMPURAM
BANGALORE-560 021
6. SRI M BALASUBRAMANI
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
R/AT NO 4212/6A 1ST MAIN
SUBRAMANYA NAGAR
MUNESWARA TEMPLE STREET
BANGALORE ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.C. G. GOPALASWAMY, ADV. FOR R2 TO R4;
R5 SERVED; VIDE ORDER DATED 20.09.2010
APPEAL DISMISSED AS AGAINST R-1)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.02.2006
PASSED IN OS.NO.2258/1990 ON THE FILE OF THE I
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BANGALORE (CCH.NO.2) DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
DECLARATION CANCELLATION OF SALE DEED AND FOR
PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
4
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the parties.
The matter is of the year 2006. It is seen that the
learned counsel for the appellants has been absent
continuously. It appears that appellants are not interested
in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MH/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!