Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Ningappa S/O Basappa Alias ... vs M/S Tungabhadra Power Co Pvt.Ltd
2022 Latest Caselaw 2380 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2380 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Sri. Ningappa S/O Basappa Alias ... vs M/S Tungabhadra Power Co Pvt.Ltd on 15 February, 2022
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                              1               M.F.A.100478/2021




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                    DHARWAD BENCH

      DATED THIS THE 15 T H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022

                           BEFORE

      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

              M.F.A. No.100478/2021 (MV)

BET WEEN

SRI. NINGA PPA S/O B ASAPPA @
SIDDAL INGA PPA LAKKUNDI,
AG: 47 Y EARS, OCC: AGRICU LTU RIST & COOL IE,
R/O: T OLAL I V ILLA GE, SHIRAHATT I TALU K,
DIST: GADAG.                           .. APPELLANT

(BY SRI.CHANDRASHEKHAR M. HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)

AND

1.     M/S. TU NGAB HADRA POWER CO. PVT .LTD.,
       #9/ 1, CLASSIC COU RT, 2ND FLOOR,
       RICHMOND ROAD, B ENGALU RU -5600 25.
       (OWNER OF THE VEHICLE BEARIN G
       No.KA-03/MH-9324)

2 .    THE BRANCH MANAGER,
       U NIT ED INDIA INSU RANCE CO. LT D.,
       NEAR ASHOK CIRCLE,
       RANEB ENNU R-581115.

3 .    THE DIV IS ION MANAGER,
       U NIT ED INDIA INSU RANCE CO. LT D.,
       ENKAY COMPLEX , KESHWAPU R,
       HUBB ALLI-5800 23.             ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.S.S.JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;
 NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH)

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEA L IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEH ICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST
THE J UDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 15.12.2020 PASS ED IN
                                   2                  M.F.A.100478/2021




MVC No.580/20 18 ON THE FILE O F T HE II ADDIT IONAL
SENIOR CIV IL JU DGE AND ADDIT IONAL MOT OR ACCIDENT
CLAIMS T RIB UNAL, RANEB EENNNU R, PARTLY ALLOW ING THE
CLAIM  PET IT ION   FOR  COMPENSAT ION    AND  S EEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

    THIS APPEA L COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                        J U D G M E N T

The instant ap peal is filed by the claimant

challenging the quantum of compensation award ed by

the Additional M.A.C.T., Raneb ennur (for brevity "the

Tribunal") in M.V.C.No.580/2018 vid e its judgment and

award d ated 15 t h December 2020.

2. Though this appeal is listed for orders, with

the consent of the learned counsels appearing for the

parties, the appeal is taken up for final disposal.

3. The parties to this appeal are referred to by

their rankings before the Tribunal for the sake of

convenience.

4. Brief facts of the case that would be

relevant for the purpose of disposal of this appeal

are:

3 M.F.A.100478/2021

On 21.06.2017 at 21:45 hours, the claimant and

his brother were traveling in their motor cycle

bearing registration No.KA-26/X-0284 from Hadagali

to Tolali. The claimant was riding as a pillion rider in

the said motor cycle and when the motor cycle

reached near Rajawal-Tolali road near Hammigi

Bridge, the offending Scorpio car bearing registration

No.KA-03/MH-9324 which was driven in a rash and

negligent manner by its driver dashed against the

motor cycle in which the claimant was riding and

caused the accident. Due to the said accident, the

claimant was grievously injured and he was treated in

a private hospital. It is under these circumstances,

he had filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming compensation of

`9,14,000/- with interest.

5. The Tribunal had partly allowed the claim

petition and awarded a compensation of `3,80,450/-

with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of

petition till realization. Being not satisfied with the 4 M.F.A.100478/2021

quantum of compensation, the present appeal is filed

by the claimant.

6. Learned counsel for the claimant submits that

the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is on the

lower side. He submits that the Tribunal has not

awarded any compensation towards pain and

suffering. He submits that even the compensation

awarded towards loss of income during laid-up period

is on the lower side.

7. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the

insurer has argued in support of the impugned

judgment and award and submits that the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and

proper and accordingly he prays to dismiss the

appeal.

8. I have carefully appreciated the arguments

addressed on both sides and also perused the

material available on record.

                               5                M.F.A.100478/2021




      9.    The    only     question     that     arises      for

consideration in this appeal is with regard to the

adequacy of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

The liability to pay compensation is not in dispute.

The claimant, who had suffered grievous injuries in

the accident in question, was admitted in a private

hospital for about eight days and the Doctor, who

had treated him, has deposed before the Tribunal

that the disability caused to the claimant having

regard to the injuries suffered in the accident was to

the tune of 30% to a particular limb. The claimant

had incurred medical expenses to the tune of

`1,48,000/-. The Tribunal has accordingly awarded

the same. The Tribunal has also awarded just and

proper compensation towards incidental expenses,

towards loss of future income due to disability and

towards loss of amenities in future life. However, the

Tribunal has not awarded any compensation to the

claimant towards pain and suffering.

6 M.F.A.100478/2021

10. In my considered view, having regard to the

nature of injuries and the treatment undergone by

him, the claimant is entitled for a sum of `25,000/-

as compensation towards pain and suffering. Further

taking the notional income of the claimant at

`10,250/-, the Tribunal has awarded compensation

towards loss of income during laid up period for one

month. Having regard to the nature of injuries and

the treatment undergone by the claimant, the

Tribunal ought to have awarded the loss of income

during laid up period at least for a period of two

months. Therefore, even under the said head, the

claimant is entitled for an additional sum of

`10,250/-. In all, the claimant is entitled for

enhanced compensation of `35,250/- over and above

the compensation of `3,80,450/- awarded by the

Tribunal. The enhanced amount of compensation

shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from the date of

petition till realization.

7 M.F.A.100478/2021

11. Since the liability to pay compensation is not

in dispute, the insurer is directed to deposit the

enhanced amount of compensation with interest

before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from

the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

12. The enhanced compensation amount being a

meager amount, the claimant is entitled to withdraw

the entire enhanced compensation amount before the

Tribunal.

The Miscellaneous first appeal is partly allowed.

The judgment and award dated 15 t h December 2020

passed by the Additional M.A.C.T., Raneb ennur in

M.V.C.No.580/2018 is accordingly modified.

Sd/-

JUDGE

KNM/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter