Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1777 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
RFA NO.822 OF 2019 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. GIRIYAMMA,
W/O. LATE MALLAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS,
2. SMT. GOWRAMMA,
W/O. LATE SRI. SIDDE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/AT OLD NO.23,
(PID NO.44-9-2), NEW NO.2,
14TH CROSS, WARD NO.44,
PADARAYANAPURA,
BENGALURU-560 038.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SHANKARE GOWDA V.N AND
SRI. MURALI B.D, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. SMT. M. LAKSHMAMMA,
W/O. SRI. SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
NO.175, 7TH CROSS,
GANAPATHI NAGAR,
HOSAKEREHALLI MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 026.
2. BRUHATH BENGALURU
MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OFFICE,
2
ROAD WIDENING SECTION-1
BBMP, COMMERCIAL COMPLEX,
2ND FLOOR, J.P.ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 078.
3. ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER,
BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
G-DIVISION-23(WARD)
JAGAJEEVANARAMANAGAR CIRCLE,
BENGALURU.
4. AUTO METER REPAIR,
MUNNABAI, MAJOR,
OLD NO.23 (PID No.44-9-2),
NEW NO.2, 14TH CROSS,
WARD NO.44, PADARAYANAPURA,
BENGALURU-560 038.
5. RAMACHANDRAPPA,
MAJOR,
OLD NO.23 (PID No.44-9-2),
NEW NO.2, 14TH CROSS,
WARD NO.44, PADARAYANAPURA,
BENGALURU-560 038.
6. NAGESHA,
S/O. LATE SIDDE GOWDA,
MAJOR, OLD NO.23.
(PID No.44-9-2),
NEW NO.2, 14TH CROSS,
WARD NO.44, PADARAYANAPURA,
BENGALURU-560 038
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAGADEESH MUNDARAGI FOR R1;
R2 AND R3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
SRI. MANJU M, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5;
SRI. M.L. PRAVEEN KUMAR FOR R6).
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
14.03.2019 PASSED IN O.S.No.4424/2010 ON THE FILE
OF THE XXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
3
JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH
VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a
memo dated 23.12.2021 with a prayer to dismiss
the appeal as not pressed.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not
pressed.
Registry is directed to return the original
documents filed by the appellants after obtaining
photo copies of the same, after due verification.
In view of the disposal of the main appeal,
pending interlocutory application does not survive
for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE AG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!