Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Wisdom Security Services vs State Of Karnataka
2022 Latest Caselaw 11252 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11252 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2022

Karnataka High Court
M/S Wisdom Security Services vs State Of Karnataka on 2 August, 2022
Bench: Acting Chief Justice, S Vishwajith Shetty
                          -1-



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

        DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2022

                       PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. ALOK ARADHE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

          WRIT APPEAL NO.517 OF 2022 (GM-TEN)


BETWEEN:

M/S. WISDOM SECURITY SERVICES
NO.106, 1ST FLOOR
40 FEET ROAD
MANJUNATHANAGAR
WEST CHORD ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 010
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PROPRIETOR N.C.PRAKASH
                                        ... APPELLANT

(BY SRI PRASAD HEGDE K, ADVOCATE)


AND:

1.      STATE OF KARNATAKA
        DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
        VIDHANA SOUDHA
        AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
        BANGALORE - 560 001
        REPRESENTED BY
        ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY

2.      M/S. KARNATAKA STATE
        BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD
        4TH FLOOR, A BLOCK
        TTMC BUILDING, BMTC
                            -2-


     SHANTHINAGAR
     BANGALORE - 560 027
     REPRESENTED BY ITS
     MANAGING DIRECTOR

3.   THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
     M/S KARNATAKA STATE
     BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD
     4TH FLOOR, A BLOCK
     TTMC BUILDING, BMTC
     SHANTHINAGAR
     BANGALORE - 560 027

4.   M/S KSF9 CORPORATE SERVICES
     PRIVATE LIMITED
     MR MANSION, NO.26-34/4
     OLD OUTER RING ROAD
     OPP. KALAGRAMA
     JNANA JYOTHI NAGAR
     MALLATHAHALLI
     BANGALORE - 560 056
     REPRESENTED BY ITS
     MANAGING DIRECTOR
                                            ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI VIJAY KUMAR A PATIL, AGA FOR R-1;
 SRI MADHU N RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & 3;
 SRI D R RAVISHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
 SRI ABHIJEET S K RAI, ADVOCATE FOR R-4)



     THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF
THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE   THE    ORDER      PASSED       IN   WRIT    PETITION
NO.9117/2022   (GM-TEN)    DATED       27.05.2022   BY   THE
LEARNED     SINGLE   JUDGE       AND    ALLOW      THE   WRIT
PETITION.


     THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
                                  -3-



                           JUDGMENT

Sri K.Prasad Hegde, learned counsel for the appellant.

Sri Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1.

Sri Madhu N. Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3;

Sri D R Ravishankar, learned Senior Counsel for Sri Abhijeet S.K. Rai, learned counsel for respondent No.4.

This intra Court appeal under Section 4 of the

Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 has been filed

against an order dated 27.05.2022 passed by the

learned Single Judge by which, the writ petition

preferred by the appellant has been disposed of with

the direction to the Managing Director of

M/s.Karnataka State Beverages Corporation Limited

to decide the dispute expeditiously.

2. The facts giving rise to filing of this appeal

briefly stated are that M/s.Karnataka State

Beverages Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred

to as 'the Corporation' for short) had issued a

e-procurement tender for outsourcing the services of

Security Guards to IML Depots of the Corporation

located in east, west, north and south zones.

Respondent No.4 was treated as the lowest bidder.

The aforesaid decision of the Corporation was

assailed by the appellant in the writ petition.

3. The learned Single Judge, in view of the

fact that the appellant had already raised a dispute

by submitting the representation dated 21.04.2022

and in view of Clause 30 of the tender document

which provides for resolution of disputes by the

Managing Director of the Corporation, disposed of

the writ petition with the direction to the Managing

Director to take a decision expeditiously.

4. It is not in dispute that in pursuance of

the aforesaid direction issued by the learned Single

Judge, the Managing Director of the Corporation, by

an order dated 21.06.2022, decided the dispute

raised by the appellant. The said decision is not

under challenge in this appeal.

5. Therefore, we deem it proper to dispose of

this appeal with the liberty to the appellant to take

recourse to such remedy as may be available to it in

law with regard to its grievance, if any.

In view of disposal of the appeal, the pending

interlocutory applications do not survive for

consideration and are accordingly disposed of.

Sd/-

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

JUDGE

bkv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter