Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Preet Agariya @ Prit Agariya vs The State Of Jharkhand ... ... O.P(S)
2026 Latest Caselaw 2404 Jhar

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2404 Jhar
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Preet Agariya @ Prit Agariya vs The State Of Jharkhand ... ... O.P(S) on 25 March, 2026

Author: Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench: Sujit Narayan Prasad
                                                      2026:JHHC:8677

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI


                     B.A. No. 2429 of 2026
                               -----

Preet Agariya @ Prit Agariya, aged about 20 years, son of Shambhunath Agariya, resident of village- Mahadeo Gali Ambikapur Ghutara Para, PO and PS: Ambikapur, Distt.: Sarguja, Chhatisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... O.P(s).

-----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

-----

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.2, Advocate For the O.P(s) : Mr. P.D.Agrawal, SPP

-----

th Order No.02/Dated: 25 March, 2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under sections 483 and 484 of the BNSS, 2023, for grant of regular bail, in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 648 of 2025, for the offence punishable under sections 21(c),22(c) of N.D.P.S. Act and section 27(b)(ii) & 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, pending in the court of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-II, Garhwa.

2. This case relates to sale and purchase of 480 pieces Avil Pehniramine Maleate Injection I.P. 10 ml Vail and 400 pieces Rexogesic Buprenorphine Injection I.P. 0.3 mg/ml vial without any valid license.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that neither the petitioner is the owner of the seized articles nor he was selling the same in the market. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 18.12.2025.Therefore, he may be released on bail.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the narcotics substance seized from the possession of the petitioner are 480 pieces Avil Pehniramine Maleate Injection I.P. 10 ml Vail and 400 pieces Rexogesic Buprenorphine Injection I.P. 0.3 mg/ml Vial which is commercial in quantity.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties, gone through the impugned order, the affidavits and the first information report.

6. Considering the facts that the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is direct allegation against him for committing the alleged offence and he has been arrested with 480 pieces Avil Pehniramine Maleate Injection I.P. 10 ml Vail and 400 pieces Rexogesic Buprenorphine Injection I.P. 0.3 mg/ml Vial of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance which is commercial quantity, this Court is of the view that the present application is fit to be dismissed.

7. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

Date: 25th March, 2026 KNR/

Uploaded on: 30.3.2026

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter