Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Gouri Shankar Enterprises Through ... vs The State Of Jharkhand
2026 Latest Caselaw 794 Jhar

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 794 Jhar
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

M/S Gouri Shankar Enterprises Through ... vs The State Of Jharkhand on 5 February, 2026

Author: Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench: Sujit Narayan Prasad
                                                                             2026:JHHC:3086-DB




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                                -----

Cont.Case (Civil) No. 1436 of 2025

-----

1. M/S Gouri Shankar Enterprises through its Proprietor, Gouri Shankar Choudhary, aged about 35 years, S/o D. Choudhary, R/o Sandi, PO Chitarpur, PS Rajrappa, District Ramgarh.

2. M/S Asha Enterprises through its proprietor, Asha Devi, aged about 58 years, wife of Dudheshwar Choudhary R/o Sandi, PO Chitarpur, PS Rajrappa, Ramgarh.

3. Chitranjan Mahto, aged about 50 years, s/o P.L.Mahto, R/o Sandi, PO Chitarpur, PS Rajrappa, Ramgarh.

4. Manoj Kumar Rai, aged about 51 years, S/o Wakil Rai, R/o Kuju PO,PS and District Ramgarh. ...... ...Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Sri Nilendu Kumar Singh, CMD, CCL, Darbhanga House, PO: GPO, PS:

Kotwali, District Ranchi.

3. Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, GM (M & S) CCL Darbhanga House, PO: GPO,PS Kotwali, Ranchi.

4. G.M. (Finance), CCL Darbhanga House, PO: GPO,PS Kotwali, Ranchi.

5. Nishant Abhishek, District Mining Officer, Ramgarh, PO, PS and District Ramgarh. ...... ...Respondents

-------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

-------

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avishek Kumar, Advocate For the CCL : Mr. A.K.Das, Advocate For the Resp.-State : AC to AG

------

th Order No.03/Dated:5 February,2026

1. Mr. Avishek Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, on instruction, has submitted that the petitioner does not intend to press the instant contempt case.

2. Such submission has been made in presence of learned counsel for the respondents.

3. Accordingly, considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioners, the instant contempt case stands dismissed as not pressed, as such, disposed of.

4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

Date:05/02/2026 KNR/ Uploaded On: 06/ 02/2026 (Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter