Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deepak Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand
2026 Latest Caselaw 1046 Jhar

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1046 Jhar
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Deepak Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 12 February, 2026

Author: Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench: Sujit Narayan Prasad
                                                2026:JHHC:3873-DB



 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
       W.P.(Cr.) (DB) (H.B.) No.671 of 2025
                         -----

Deepak Kumar, aged about 21 years, Son of Shri Kameshwar Saw, Resident of Village- Oriya, P.O.- Oriya, P.S.-Hazaribagh Muffasil, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.

                                  ...    ...    Petitioner
                          Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh.

3. The Station House Officer, Hazaribagh Muffasil Police Station, Hazaribagh.

4. Amjad Ansari, Son of Imaaman, Resident of Village- Baihari, P.O.- Oriya, P.S. Hazaribagh Muffasil, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.

5. Iftikhar Ansari, Son of Imaaman, Resident of Village- Baihari, P.O.- Oriya, P.S.- Hazaribagh Muffasil, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. ... ... Respondents

-------

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

-------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagdeesh, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Moushmi Chatterjee, AC to GA-V. For the Resp. Nos.4&5 : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate

------

Order No. 06/Dated 12 February, 2026 th

1. The present writ petition has been filed under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking therein the

following reliefs :-

a. For issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus, or any other suitable writ, order, or direction, directing Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to produce the corpus, namely the wife of the petitioner, Sana Parween, who has been in the exclusive and forceful custody of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and their family members since 21.04.2025, before this Hon'ble Court, and further to release the corpus forthwith so as to enable her to live her life as per her own free will and choice.

2026:JHHC:3873-DB

b. For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioner and the corpus, namely the wife of the petitioner, Sana Parween, who are facing a grave threat to their personal life and liberty at the hands of the private respondents, in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bhagwan Das v. NCT of Delhi, (2011) 6 SCC 396, and Lata Singh v. State of U.P., (2006) 5 SCC 475 and Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M., (2018) 16 SCC 368."

2. This Court thought it proper, on consideration of

the ground taken in the present writ petition of detention of

the daughter of the Respondent No.4, to whom the

marriage has been said to be solemnized with the writ

petitioner.

3. This Court, in view of the judgment passed by

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Devu G. Nair v. The

State of Kerala & Others [(2024) Live Law (SC) 249],

has called upon the daughter of the Respondent No.4.

4. We, after following the ratio laid down by Hon'ble

Apex Court in the case of Devu G. Nair v. The State of

Kerala & Others (Supra), have interacted with the

daughter of the Respondent No.4 by putting a question as

to whether she is feeling comfortable in interacting with the

Court. She has stated that she is much-much comfortable.

5. This Court has posed another query that whatever

is being said by her whether it is under the prompting of

2026:JHHC:3873-DB

her mother or father, she has totally denied the same and

has stated that what will be said by her is on her own sweet

will and with all conscience.

6. The daughter of the Respondent No.4 has further

stated that she wants to live with her family.

7. She has further stated that she wants to pursue

higher studies and does not want to live with the petitioner.

8. Mr. Jagdeesh, learned counsel for the petitioner,

after hearing the aforesaid interaction, has sought for leave

of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

9.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

and as such, disposed of.

10. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also

stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 12th February, 2026

Birendra/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter