Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gafaruddin Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand
2026 Latest Caselaw 2875 Jhar

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2875 Jhar
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Gafaruddin Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2026

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
                                                                2026:JHHC:10359


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
                                     ----

A.B.A. No. 1464 of 2026

----

Gafaruddin Ansari, aged about 32 years, son of Khursed Mian, resident of Village Lakhibad, PO Paljori and PS Garsara, District Deoghar .... Petitioner

-- Versus --

1.The State of Jharkhand

2.Victim/ Opp.Party No.2 ....Opposite Parties

----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

---

For the Petitioner :- Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, Advocate

----

2/09.04.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection

with Palajori PS Case No.59 of 2025, for offence registered under

section 81, 90(2), 89, 64(1), 61(2) of BNS, 2023, pending in court

of learned Sessions Judge, Camp at Madhupur.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the alleged

relationship between the petitioner and the complainant was there

since March, 2024 to 31.01.2025. He next submits that

unnecessarily the complaint case has been field which has been

subsequently converted into the FIR. He also submits that in the

meantime, the informant's marriage was solemnized with another

person and when the information about the relationship between

the petitioner and the informant came to the knowledge of the

husband of the complainant, the husband of the informant has

divorced the informant and thereafter she has again pressurized the

2026:JHHC:10359

petitioner to marry her and thereafter only, the present case has

been lodged. He next submits that the case is further falsified as

the sister of this petitioner has been said to be conspirator for

making the petitioner close to the informant.

4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that on

the false pretext of marriage, the relationship was established.

5. Admittedly, initially, the complaint case was filed which was

later on converted into FIR. The relationship, as per the complaint

petition, was since March, 2024 till 30.01.2025, and in the

meantime, the informant has solemnized marriage with another

person, and subsequently, that person has divorced the informant,

and thereafter, again she has pressurized the petitioner to marry

her and even the sister of the petitioner is said to be the conspirator

for making the petitioner close to the informant. Prima-facie, it

appears that this is an after-thought allegation made against the

petitioner, and in that view of the matter, the petitioner, above

named, is, hereby, directed to surrender before learned court within

two weeks from today, and learned court shall release the

petitioner, above named, on such terms and conditions as well as

sureties as the learned court may deem fit and proper.

6. A.B.A. No.1464 of 2026 is disposed of.

( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 09.04.2026 SI/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter