Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ranjeet Choudhary @ Ranjeet Kumar ... vs The State Of Jharkhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 5974 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5974 Jhar
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Ranjeet Choudhary @ Ranjeet Kumar ... vs The State Of Jharkhand on 18 September, 2025

Author: Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench: Sujit Narayan Prasad
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
       Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No.1 of 2025
                        -----

Ranjeet Choudhary @ Ranjeet Kumar Chaudhary, aged about 57 years, S/o Praduman Chaudhary, resident of village Jarangdih, Krishna Ballabh College, P.O. Bermo, P.S. Bokaro Thermal, Dist: Bokaro. ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Respondent

-------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

-------

For the Appellant : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P.

------

Order No. 09/Dated 18 September, 2025 th

I.A. No.9762 of 2025

1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed

under Section 430(1) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha

Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the appellant for suspension of

sentence dated 30.11.2024 passed in connection with

Sessions Trial No.141 of 2022 arising out of Bokaro

Thermal P.S. Case No.155 of 2020 by the learned Addl.

Sessions Judge-II, FTC, Bermo at Tenughat (Bokaro)

whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted

and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 12

years with fine of Rs.20,000/- for the offence under Section

376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code and in default of

payment of fine amount, to further undergo R.I. for six

months.

2. Mr. Pran Pranay, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant, has submitted that earlier to the instant

interlocutory application, one another interlocutory

application was filed being I.A. No.2164 of 2025, however,

the same was withdrawn after some argument.

3. Learned counsel has submitted that the prayer for

suspension of sentence has again been renewed by filing

the instant interlocutory application on the ground of

custody of more than three years against the maximum

sentence of 12 years.

4. Learned counsel has submitted that based upon the

aforesaid ground, the prayer for suspension of sentence

may be considered.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for

the State has made opposition so far as the issue on merit

is concerned, but has admitted the fact that in a case of

term sentence, if the sentence has been substantially

undergone, then the prayer can be considered.

6. We have learned counsel for the parties and gone

through the rival submissions made on their behalf.

7. The appellant has been sentenced for maximum

punishment of 12 years against which he has remained in

custody for more than three years which he has completed

on 20.07.2025.

8. At this juncture it needs to refer herein the settled

proposition of law that when a convicted person is

sentenced to a fixed period of sentence and when he files

an appeal under any statutory right, suspension of

sentence should be considered by the Appellate Court

liberally unless there are exceptional circumstances,

reference in this regard be made to the judgment rendered

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Aasif @ Pasha vs.

The state of U.P & Ors. 2025 Live Law (SC) 784.

9. This Court, considering the fact that against the

term punishment, if the substantial period of sentence has

been undergone, then the prayer for suspension is to be

considered.

10. This Court, considering the fact that the appellant

has already undergone sentence of 03 years and the instant

appeal which is of the year 2025 is not likely to be taken up

in near future as such, is of the view that the instant

interlocutory application needs to be allowed.

11. Accordingly, the instant Interlocutory Application

stands allowed.

12. In view thereof, the appellant, named above, is

directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl.

Sessions Judge-II, FTC, Bermo at Tenughat (Bokaro) in

connection with Sessions Trial No.141 of 2022 arising out

of Bokaro Thermal P.S. Case No.155 of 2020.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 18th September, 2025 Birendra/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter