Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5907 Jhar
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M. A. No. 379 of 2018
Smt. Nirmala Prasad .... .... Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... .... Respondents
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
-----
For the Appellant : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Sinha, Advocate
-----
Oral Order 05 / Dated : 17.09.2025
Office has pointed out defect No.2 that in the impugned judgment,
name and designation of learned Presiding Officer and the name and address
of all the parties with P.O., P.S. and District along with parentage are
missing.
Under the circumstance, let the judgment be sent to the learned Trial
Court for making necessary correction and after correction the same will be
sent by the learned Trial Court to this Court within four weeks.
Put up this case after four weeks.
In the meantime, learned counsel for the appellant is directed to
remove defect No.1 as pointed out by the office.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17th September, 2025 AKT/Satendra
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!