Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5522 Jhar
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2025
2025:JHHC:26887
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No.4812 of 2025
------
Jyoti Chawda, W/o Vijay Kumar, R/o Ranibandh Road No.3, Dhiya, P.O. ISM, P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad. ... ... Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through Principal Secretary, School Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. + P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.
2. The Director, Directorate of Primary Education, School Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. + P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, at P.O., P.S. & District Dhanbad.
4. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad, at P.O. + P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad.
... ... Respondents
------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J
------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal, Advocate
Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vishal Kr. Rai, AC to GA-IV
------
03/ 04.09.2025
Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and
learned counsel representing the respondents.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is entitled
to get the notional benefit of Grade-IV Pay from the date of
appointment.
3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that
the issue has already been set at rest by several judgments of this
Court and ultimately it has been held that the clause which prohibited
the retired and deceased employees to get the said benefits, has been
struck down. He submits that the effect of striking down the said
clause is that all the employees be they superannuated or deceased,
are entitled to get the notional benefit of Grade-1, Grade-2, Grade-3
2025:JHHC:26887
& Grade-4 Pay. He submits that the respondents are now extending
the benefits to only those persons who are approaching this Court. He
further submits that the petitioner has filed a representation before
the District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad, but no decision
has yet been taken.
4. Learned counsel representing the respondent-State
submits that if the petitioner files a fresh representation annexing the
judgments of the High Court, her case will be considered.
5. Considering the aforesaid submission, I direct the
petitioner to file a detailed representation before the District
Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad, annexing all the documents
which she relies upon including the judgments passed by this Court
and also the orders by which similarly situated persons have been
extended the benefits by the respondents.
6. The representation must be filed within a period of four
weeks. If such representation is filed, the concerned respondents will
consider the case of the petitioners within six weeks thereafter.
7. If any adverse order is passed against the claim /
representation of the petitioner, the reasons thereof should be
communicated to the petitioner.
8. Before parting, I direct the Director, Directorate of Primary
Education, School Education & Literacy Department, Government of
Jharkhand, to look into this issue and if the decision of this Court in
W.P.(S) No.2589 of 2020 (Sudhir Narayan Dwary & Ors. Vs. The State
of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other Analogues cases, is in rem, he should
ensure that all the similarly situated persons will get the same
2025:JHHC:26887
benefits without they being forced to approach this Court.
9. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands
disposed of.
10. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Director, Directorate
of Primary Education, School Education & Literacy Department,
Government of Jharkhand.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
Prashant.Cp-2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!