Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4261 Jhar
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2025
2025:JHHC:16875-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A No.156 of 2023
Sushma Rani Ekka, aged about 48 years, daughter of Anslem Ekka, resident
of Village- Kurkura, P.O.- Mando, P.S.- Mandar, District- Ranchi.
-- --- Petitioner/Appellant
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.Director, Secondary Education, Government of Jharkhand having office at
Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi
3.Chairman, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having office at Kali
Nagar, Chay Bagan, P.O.& P.s.- Namkum, District- Ranchi
4.Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having Office at Kali
Nagar, Chay Bagan, P.O. & p.S.- Namkum, District- Ranchi
5.Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having
office at Kali Nagar, Chay Bagan, P.O. & P.S- Namkum, District- Ranchi
--- --- Respondents/Respondents
.......
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Appellant : Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Responent-State : Mr. Kumar Rahul Kamlesh, Advocate For the Respondent-JSSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate
Order No.10/ Dated 25th June 2025
1. The instant appeal has been filed under clause 10 of the Letters
Patent, which is directed against the order dated 17.11.2022 passed in
W.P.(S) No. 4691 of 2019 whereby and where under the claim of the
writ petitioner has been rejected on the ground that writ petitioner
failed to produce the residential certificate till the last date for
submission of application in terms of the conditions of the
advertisement.
2. Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the Respondent- Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission has submitted
that this intra-court appeal has lost its force, reason being that after the
judgment has been passed by the learned Apex Court in S.L.P.(Civil)
No. 12490 of 2020 in the case of Satyajit Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of 2025:JHHC:16875-DB
Jharkhand & Ors., the case of the writ petitioner has been
reconsidered on the ground that the rejection of the candidature in the
earlier round of the consideration of the writ petitioner's candidature
has been deprecated by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
3. It has been submitted that the petitioner, having found to be
under the zone of consideration, has been called for consideration of
his candidature but he has not been found to have the degree of post
graduation in Sanskrit as he failed to produce the relevant certificate.
Hence, his candidature has been rejected on the ground of lack of
education qualification. The said submission has been made, based
upon the averments made by JSSC at para 49 to 54 in their counter
affidavit filed in the instant appeal.
4. Upon this, learned counsel for the appellant has sought for
leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal with a liberty to challenge
the fresh order of rejection before the appropriate Court, if the
petitioner so wishes.
5. On consideration of the prayer of learned counsel for the
appellant, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the
aforesaid liberty and consequently disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
A.Mohanty/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!