Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Roshni Khalkho & Ors vs The State Of Jharkhand & Ors. ... ... Opp. ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 904 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 904 Jhar
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Roshni Khalkho & Ors vs The State Of Jharkhand & Ors. ... ... Opp. ... on 18 July, 2025

Author: Ananda Sen
Bench: Ananda Sen
         IN THE    HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                    Cont. Case (Civil) No.114 of 2024
                                ------
     Roshni Khalkho & Ors.                             ... ... Petitioners
                                   Versus
     The State of Jharkhand & Ors.                   ... ... Opp. Parties
                                   WITH
                    Cont. Case (Civil) No.331 of 2024
                                ------
     Rina Kumari.                                      ... ... Petitioner
                                   Versus
     The State of Jharkhand & Ors.                   ... ... Opp. Parties
                                ------
     For the Petitioners     :      Mr. Binod Singh, Advocate
                                    Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate
     For the O.P.            :      Md. Shahabuddin, SC-VII
                                    Mr. Zaid Imam, AC to SC-VII
                                    Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate
                                    Mrs. Shilpi Sandil Gadodia,
                                    Advocate
                                    Mr. Prakhar Harit, Advocate
                                ------
                 CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

------

17 /18.07.2025

The order dated 04.01.2024 passed in W.P.(C)

Nos.1923 of 2023 (Rina Kumari Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and

2290 of 2023 (Roshni Khalkho & Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand

& Ors.), has not been taken seriously by the State. On the one

hand, the State submits that they will conduct the elections for the

Local Body but their sincere intent and efforts are missing.

2. These two contempt petitions arise out of the final

order dated 04.01.2024 passed in W.P.(C) Nos.1923 of 2023 and

2290 of 2023, wherein the Court, while relying upon the judgment

of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Suresh Mahajan V.

State of M.P. reported in (2022) 12 SCC 770, had directed the

State to conduct the Election of the Municipal Bodies in the State

of Jharkhand. The Court had held that the judgment passed in the

case of Suresh Mahajan (supra), squarely covers the issue, thus

the two writ petitions were allowed. Be it noted that the Elections

of the Municipal Bodies have not been conducted since June, 2020

in twelve Urban Local Bodies including Deoghar and Dhanbad

Municipal Corporation and since 27th April, 2023, in the entire

State.

3. The aforesaid order passed in the writ petitions were

challenged in Letters Patent Appeal being L.P.A. Nos.57 of 2024

and 55 of 2024. The Division Bench of this Court after hearing the

parties, dismissed both these Letters Patent Appeals filed by the

State.

4. Admittedly, the State has not challenged the

judgment passed in these two Letters Patent Appeals before the

Hon'ble Supreme Court. This means that the State has accepted

the order of the Writ Court affirmed by the Division Bench in its

entirety. When they had accepted both the orders, the only option

before the State is to conduct the Elections as per the mandamus

issued by the Court.

5. As the Elections were not held, these two Contempt

Petitions were filed on 02.02.2024 and 12.04.2024 respectively.

On 13.01.2025, an objection was taken by the State that the Chief

Electoral Officer of the State of Jharkhand, has not supplied the

voters list. On 16.01.2025, the Chief Electoral Officer of the State

of Jharkhand, prayed for one week's time to inform this Court as

to by what time he will furnish the up to date Electoral Rolls to the

State to facilitate the elections of the Local Bodies in terms of the

order passed in the writ petitions.

On 07.02.2025, Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned

counsel representing the State Election Commission, stated that

the State Election Commission will start the process of

disintegration, based on the voter list forwarded to them by the

Election Commission of India.

6. Learned counsel representing the State submitted

that till date Electoral Rolls on the basis of voters list has not been

forwarded to the State, thus, it is not possible to hold the elections.

7. Learned counsel representing the State Election

Commission submits that as on date, the post of Chief Election

Commissioner is vacant. As per them the said post in the State is

vacant since 25th March, 2025. As the post is vacant, the matter is

still pending. On query, both the State and the Election

Commission admitted that it is the State who has to appoint the

Chief Election Commissioner.

8. The situation is that the preparation of the Electoral

Roll is not complete because of the fact that the post of Chief

Election Commissioner is vacant since 25th March, 2025, which

according to the State is coming in the way of complying the order

of this Court. On the other hand, as per the State Election

Commission, since the State is not appointing the Chief Election

Commissioner, they are not in a position to proceed in compiling

the voters list.

9. This is a lackadaisical approach of the State. This is

also a very novel way to put forth a situation and prepare a shield

for not complying the order of this Court. If the State acts in this

manner, least said the better.

10. The Rule of Law will never be established if this is

the attitude of the State. By not filling up the post of Chief Election

Commissioner, the State is trying to defer the Election of the Urban

Local Bodies and thereby also deliberately deferring the

implementation of order of this Court which directed to conduct

Elections. The Court while deciding the writ petitions, has clearly

held that not holding the elections amounts to throttling the voice

of the people. Any temporary arrangement cannot be continued

for long, especially when it relates to Election. This Court has also

held that running the Local Bodies by the Administrator defies the

basic tenor of Democracy. Deferring elections for Local Bodies is a

direct attack on the Constitution and is also an attack on the

Democracy.

By not holding the elections in spite of the

mandamus issued by the Court, not only the Democracy is kept at

stake but the Rule of Law has also been put on jeopardy by the

State, by not implementing the order of the Court, more so when

the same has attained finality. This is nothing but defiance. All

these are solely attributable to the State Executives who are

exclusively to be blamed for this.

11. Since prima facie I am of the view that the contempt

has been committed, let the Chief Secretary, State of Jharkhand,

appear before this Court on 25th August, 2025, to show cause as

to why not the charge will be framed for committing contempt of

order dated 04.01.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) Nos.1923

of 2023 and 2290 of 2023.

(ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant.Cp-2

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter