Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 682 Jhar
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Second Appeal No. 110 of 2024
Sunil Das ..........Appellant
... Versus....
Prasant Kumar Singh ....... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Appellant : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Vandana Singh, Advocate
06/Dated: 10/07/2025 I.A. No. 10963 of 2024 has been filed for accepting vakalatnama
on behalf of sole respondent.
2. For the reasons assigned in the I.A, prayer made in I.A. is allowed.
3. I.A. No. 10963 of 2024 stands allowed and disposed of.
4. Vakalatnama on behalf of sole respondent is accepted.
5. This appeal shall be heard on the following substantial question
of law:-
i. Whether the learned First Appellate Court failed to
consider that the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)-VII, Deoghar
has erroneously surpassed, over looked its jurisdiction while rejecting
the plaint filed by the appellant under Order VII Rule 11 read with
section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure ?
ii. Whether the judgments of both the courts in deciding
the petition under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure
have been passed under the parameters of Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C.
in the light of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of " P.V.
Guru Raj Reddy Vs. P. Neeradha Reddy and others" reported in
2015 (2) PLJR 205 (SC) and in the case of " Exphar SA & Anr. Vs.
Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. and Anr." reported in 2004 (2)
Supreme 146."
6. Call for Trial Court Record.
7. Since the vakalatnama has already been accepted on behalf of sole
respondent there is not need to issue notice upon sole respondent.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!