Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 534 Jhar
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2025
2025:JHHC:17666-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No. 50 of 2025
With
I.A. 12562 of 2024
1. Ranjit Kumar, S/o Kalpu Ram, R/o Village-Ramgadhawan, PO-
Khetalpur, PS-Chaubeypur, District-Varanasi (U.P.)
2. Satish Chand, S/o Mehesh Chand, R/o 236 Raghunathpura,
Pinahat Dehat, PO & PS-Pinahat, District-Agra (U.P.)
3. Vinay Kumar Sonkar, S/o Tara Chandra Sonkar, R/o 368 Rana
Pratap Nagar, Rawatpur, S.O., Kanpur Nagar, District-Kanpur
4. Vijay Nagle, S/o Kishorilal Nagle, R/o 216 Near Ram Mandir,
Patel Ward 16, PO & PS-Sadar, District-Betul (M.P.)
5. Bijoy Roy, S/o Jiten Roy, R/o Lodhurka, PO & PS-Hura, District-
Purulia (W.B.) ... ... Appellants
Versus
1. The Central Coalfields Limited, through its Chairman-cum-
Managing Director, Ranchi
2. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Central Coalfields Limited,
Ranchi
3. Director (Personnel), Central Coalfields Limited, Ranchi
4. General Manager, Personnel/Rectt., Central Coalfields Limited,
Ranchi
5. Raviranjan Kumar, S/o Upendra Prasad Singh, R/o Village-
Lalganj, PO-Sugnu, PS-Sadar, Lalganj, District-Ranchi
6. Sudheer Kumar, S/o Kishori Prasad, R/o Near Shiv Mandir,
Chhotka Karsan, Malhari, PO & PS-Imamganj, District-Gaya
(Bihar) ... ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
-----
For the Appellants : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate Mrs. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Respondent-CCL : Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, Advocate
-----
02/03.07.2025 I.A. No. 12562 of 2024 is filed to condone the delay
of 729 days in filing the appeal, challenging the judgment of the
learned Single Judge.
2. The contention of the applicants is that they belong
to the State of Uttar Pradesh as well as other States and after
they came to know about the judgment, they came to Ranchi,
consulted advocate for getting opinion as to whether appeal
should be filed or not and then they returned back to their
2025:JHHC:17666-DB
parental home. Later, they again consulted an advocate and
decided to file the L.P.A. It is stated that they are unemployed
and are fighting for employment and so could not arrange the
amount for preferring the appeal.
3. The judgment of the learned Single Judge was
pronounced on 06.12.2022 and the appeal is filed almost two
years later on 21.11.2024. Even the application for issuance of
certified copy was made on 05.12.2024 after the appeal was
filed. No explanation is offered for not even applying for issuance
of the certified copy after the judgment was pronounced.
4. Merely because the applicants are from the state of
Uttar Pradesh and other States, no indulgence can be shown to
them since they had legal advice which would have indicated
that the time for preferring the appeal is only 30 days. The plea
that the applicants are unemployed and had difficulties in
arranging the money to file the appeal cannot also be
countenanced, since nothing prevented them from availing legal
aid.
5. We, therefore, do not find any merit in this
application. It is accordingly dismissed.
6. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
(M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish/Ritesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!