Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 511 Jhar
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Second Appeal No. 117 of 2013
Hiralal Nayak & Ors. ... Appellant(s)
Versus
Sushanta Kumar & Ors. ... Respondent(s)
With Second Appeal No. 121 of 2013
Hiralal Nayak & Ors. ... Appellant(s) Versus Minor Sushanta Kumar & Ors. ... Respondent(s)
Coram:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Rishav Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Adv.
Order No.28/Dated- 2nd July, 2025
1. Heard the parties.
2. The following substantial question of law arises in the present appeal:-
(i) Whether the First Appellate Court has committed an error of law by
not setting out points of determination, record the decision thereon,
and give its own reasons and thereby failed to comply with the
requirement of order 41 Rule 31 CPC and the non-observance of this
requirement led to the perversity in the impunged judgment?
3. Other substantial questions of law may be considered at the time of
hearing.
4. Admit.
5. Office is directed to call for the trail court record.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Amar/ Uploaded
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!