Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Keshri Devi (Deleted)
2025 Latest Caselaw 2073 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2073 Jhar
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Keshri Devi (Deleted) on 28 January, 2025

Author: Gautam Kumar Choudhary
Bench: Gautam Kumar Choudhary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
             M.A. No. 379 of 2015
National Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office at Kahalgaon, Dist.- Bhagalpur
through Divisional, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Sumrit Mandal Complex, Jail
Road, Tilka Manjhi, P.O., P.S. & District- Bhagalpur
                                                   ....    ....   Appellant
                                        Versus
1. Keshri Devi (Deleted)
2. Shyam Sunder Mahto, S/o Late Bharat Mahto
3. Umesh Kumar Mahto, S/o Late Bharat Mahto
   All residents of Village- Ghorichak, P.O. Partapur, P.S. Belbadda, District-
   Godda
4. Anil Kumar Singh, S/o Late Indrajit Singh, R/o Village & P.O. Topra Tola-
   Sarmatpur, P.S. Pirpainty, District-Bhagalpur (Owner of Truck)
5. Md. Mohiuddin (Deleted)
                                                   ...        ....     Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant               : Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate
                                  Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents             : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate
                                  Mr. Amarjeet Prasad, Advocate
                           ------

Order No. 14 / Dated : 28.01.2025.

Heard learned counsel in I.A. No. 984 of 2025 which has been filed under Order XXII Rule 4/11 & 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act for the substitution of respondent nos. 1, who died on 19.12.2022 during the pendency of the appeal.

It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of the appellant that death of the respondent nos. 1 was not within his knowledge and only information being given by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, it could be known that respondent no. 1 had died.

Considering the grounds taken in the aforesaid interlocutory application, the delay in filing the substitution petition is condoned and further proposed legal heirs are necessary parties in the facts and circumstances of the case and, therefore, interlocutory application filed for substitution of Respondent No.1 is allowed.

Office is directed to substitute the name of respondent nos. 1 by the proposed legal heirs as detailed in Para 6 of the interlocutory application and as such, their names will be reflected with red ink in the cause title of the memo of appeal.

Accordingly, Interlocutory application is disposed of.

1. The instant Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the award of compensation of Rs. 5,09,000/- awarded in favour of the claimants by the Principal District Judge-cum-Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Judge, Godda in Title (M.V.) Suit No. 22 of 2012.

.2. Facts of the case is not much in dispute that one Bharat Mahto died in a motor vehicle accident involving a truck bearing registration No. BR- 10G/3792 which was under the insurance cover of the appellant - Insurance company.

3. Award of compensation is assailed mainly on two counts: -

(I) The monthly income of Rs. 6,000/- of the deceased has been computed;

(II) Award of compensation amount along with the interest at the rate of 9% per annum has been awarded.

4. On perusal of the impugned judgment it is manifestly clear that the income of Rs 6000/- and considering his occupation of mason, it cannot be said to exaggerated. Therefore, with regard to the monthly income of the deceased by which finding of fact recorded by the learned Tribunal on the basis of the evidence on record cannot be interfered. This Court does not feel deem and proper to interfere with the said finding of fact. However, as far as the interest part is concerned, the interest at the rate of 6% per annum is awarded on the compensation amount from the date of filing of the claim application till its realization.

6. The appellant-insurance company is directed to deposit the compensation amount before the learned Tribunal within six weeks. Thereafter, learned Tribunal shall disburse the same to the claimant(s) within two weeks.

7. With this modification, the miscellaneous appeal stands dismissed.

8. Let the statutory amount be remitted to the learned Tribunal which will be adjusted in the compensation amount to be paid to the claimant(s)/ substituted legal heirs and the other original claimant(s).

(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Pawan/Sandeep-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter