Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Punam Linda vs The State Of Jharkhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 1441 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1441 Jhar
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Punam Linda vs The State Of Jharkhand on 8 January, 2025

Author: Ananda Sen
Bench: Ananda Sen
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                        W.P.(S) No.7273 of 2023
                                  ------

1. Punam Linda.

2. Rajesh Tirkey

3. Camil Kujur

4. Sarita Lakra

5. Cecilia Lakra

6. Archna Barwa

7. Fulrida Shanti Tirkey

8. Darshan Soren

9. Anjana Binita Kindo

10. Elish Sanga

11. Jiwan Joachim Toppo

12. Urmila Minj

13. Jeneviba Minj

14. Rekha Ekka

15. Suman Toppo

16. Anora Toppo ... ... Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

2. The Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy Development, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

4. Jharkhand Academic Council, through its Secretary, Gyandeep Campus Bargawan, Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

... ... Respondents

------

              CORAM        : SRI ANANDA SEN, J
                                 ------
   For the Petitioner(s) :    Mr. Peter Martin T.J., Advocate

Mr. Shiv Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Divyam, AC to SC-IV

------

05/ 08.01.2025

By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioners have

sought for following reliefs:-

i. "A writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ/s or order/s or direction/s directing the State Respondents to initiate the process of direct appointment of Jharkhand Teacher Eligibility Test-2016(JTET-2016 in brief) qualified candidates including the petitioners herein as Assistant Teachers in Government run schools by preparing promptly the merit list of

the qualified candidates for Levels 1 & 2 (Primary and Middle School levels) and conducting the required conselling as per the Jharkhand Primary School Teacher Recruitments Rule, 2012 to be appointed as Assistant Teachers in various State Government run schools.

AND ii. Pass an appropriate order/s or give any direction/s for staying the process initiated through the publication of Government Advertisement being Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission being Advertisement No.13/2023 dated 19.07.2023 under the Assistant Teacher Cadre (Appointment, Promotion and Service Condition) Rules, 2022 wherein the JTET-2016 qualified candidates including the petitioners herein are required to appear once again the qualifying (mains) examination to be appointed as Sahayak Acharya (which is lower in grade and pay scale) in various government run schools."

2. The basic contention of the petitioners is that they

should be considered for appointment in terms of Jharkhand

Elementary School Teachers Appointment Rules, 2012 (hereinafter

to be referred as the "Rules of 2012").

3. The State Government has now promulgated Jharkhand

Elementary School Assistant Acharya Cadre (Appointment,

Promotion & Conditions of Service) Rules, 2022 (hereinafter to be

referred as the "Rules of 2022"). The aforesaid Rules of 2022 were

challenged in W.P.(S) No.4425 of 2023 in (Sanjay Pater Munda &

Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.), before this Court.

4. The Division Bench of this Court negated the said

challenge and upheld the said Rules.

5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition

(Civil) Diary No(s).23389/2024 vide order dated 09.09.2024, did

not interfere with the judgment dated 07.12.2023 passed by the

Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(S) No.4425 of 2023.

6. The Rules of 2022 were promulgated in supersession of

the Appointment Rules of 2012. Since the Rules of 2012 have

already been superseded by the Rules of 2022, no order can be

passed in favour of the petitioners directing the respondents to

appoint them in terms of the Rules of 2012. Thus, I find no merit in

this writ petition.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed.

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

Prashant.Cp-2

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter